Gotta get your references to lock in for yaGoddamn son you don’t gotta tell them everything. If it ain’t in your system at MEPS the ain’t gone find out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gotta get your references to lock in for yaGoddamn son you don’t gotta tell them everything. If it ain’t in your system at MEPS the ain’t gone find out.
Let me get this straight, you disclosed the drug use on your SF86 which goes to NRC but didn't disclose to your recruiter, this means you falsified your documents.Ok i was already at MEPS earlier this year for a diff beanch. Didn't disclose all that, just on the sf86. They dont cross check those? What should I tell my recruiter? I said I disclosed drug use on my 86 and I may need a waiver.
Ok i was already at MEPS earlier this year for a diff beanch. Didn't disclose all that, just on the sf86. They dont cross check those? What should I tell my recruiter? I said I disclosed drug use on my 86 and I may need a waiver.
Let me get this straight, you disclosed the drug use on your SF86 which goes to NRC but didn't disclose to your recruiter, this means you falsified your documents.
You need to disclose this to your recruiter as these documents don't go away, people can and have been booted out for lying on documents.
If you disclose now probably the worst that will happen is you will need to redo some documents and get a waiver.
You should also not just make this a phone call since if your recruiter doesn't do anything and later you are found out this will still all be on you as you won't have any proof you told anyone.
@FormerRecruitingGuru may have some better advice or can correct what I have told you if needed.
I'm pretty sure even if you were to omit your drug use on your non-sf86 documents, the people responsible for processing your packet would verify your SF86 forms align with your non-sf86 documents.When applying to a different branch I didnt disclose on sf86 or recruiter, but this sf86 I disclosed and I talked to my recruiter today about a drug waiver.
The recruiter said that they didnt send my sf86 and that if I make mins for ISEL they can have me edit the sf86 and hinted at changing info without actually saying that.
It doesn't sit right with me, but also if I do qualify for ISEL that would be good because the board just got pushed back again to July with no end in sight.
Should I not take my recruiters advice and just fill get the waiver sorted? I feel like at this point for the most part my hands are fairly clean?
Edit: Also previously I held a intrem secret for a gov internship that I didnt disclose on. Since thats 2 do I just have to stick to my guns now? I wanted to come clean this time around but would that bite me in the ass?
Also tagging @FormerRecruitingGuru
Yeah I get that, I guess my pickle is the last 2 I omitted on and my initial MEPS for a different branch earlier this year. This sf86 hasn't been sent apparently, so do I stay consistent or spill the beans? There's no records of any of this other than if they find a random high school friend that knew I did some thing. Mind you I was never a crack head or bad kid.I'm pretty sure even if you were to omit your drug use on your non-sf86 documents, the people responsible for processing your packet would verify your SF86 forms align with your non-sf86 documents.
Before I applied to this board, I was going for Army OCS and had an Army recruiter try to get me to lie on all my documents about my dropped marijuana charges(Army recruiters resort to this because their moral waiver process is x10 mundane as opposed to other branches). I told him helll nooo because I already had a clearance, and obviously it's wrong. He still went ahead and submitted documents behind my back, and the Army Batallion that processes OCS packets rejected it because it didn't align with what I truthfully said to my security interview and documents. Shit was dumb as hell, but yeah, even though it's a different branch, I'm sure there still an entity that verifys every document submitted.
I am pretty sure the OCS checklist under section 2 item 4? requires submission of the SF86 Equip in order to go to board. I doubt that has changed as that is how NRC makes sure there isn't anything missed that could cause a security clearance issue.When applying to a different branch I didnt disclose on sf86 or recruiter, but this sf86 I disclosed and I talked to my recruiter today about a drug waiver.
The recruiter said that they didnt send my sf86 and that if I make mins for ISEL they can have me edit the sf86 and hinted at changing info without actually saying that.
It doesn't sit right with me, but also if I do qualify for ISEL that would be good because the board just got pushed back again to July with no end in sight.
Should I not take my recruiters advice and just fill get the waiver sorted? I feel like at this point for the most part my hands are fairly clean?
Edit: Also previously I held a intrem secret for a gov internship that I didnt disclose on. Since thats 2 do I just have to stick to my guns now? I wanted to come clean this time around but would that bite me in the ass?
Also tagging @FormerRecruitingGuru
That Army recruiter must have slept through the background check process part of school. The federal government sees everything, I had a person about to go to OCS when I was asked about his shoplifting charge when he was 14/15? it turns out he went through diversion, and it was dropped but because he was charged it popped on the background check. He wrote a statement and all was good.I'm pretty sure even if you were to omit your drug use on your non-sf86 documents, the people responsible for processing your packet would verify your SF86 forms align with your non-sf86 documents.
Before I applied to this board, I was going for Army OCS and had an Army recruiter try to get me to lie on all my documents about my dropped marijuana charges(Army recruiters resort to this because their moral waiver process is x10 mundane as opposed to other branches). I told him helll nooo because I already had a clearance, and obviously it's wrong. He still went ahead and submitted documents behind my back, and the Army Batallion that processes OCS packets rejected it because it didn't align with what I truthfully said to my security interview and documents. Shit was dumb as hell, but yeah, even though it's a different branch, I'm sure there still an entity that verifys every document submitted.