F-14 Tomcat's "other"
At the time, they believed that the aircraft was spinproof. Then they lost one at Pax and found out that it had a nasty flat spin mode (upright and inverted) that appeared to be unrecoverable although two separate gents claim to have successfully recovered from them. It was the top boldface procedure and every Tomcat rider could recite the steps in their sleep (ejecting the RIO to get the nose down in upright spin was not a step, although it was talked about in the Ready Room). Problem was if spin got fully developed, both pilot and aircrew would likely be incapacitated and out of position to eject so you had to do something fast. Motors are so far apart and the TF30 in the A model so stall prone that loss of one presented real danger of departing and starting the dance.
Blutonski816 said:It's funny how older pubs can BS you... I have 1977 book on USN fighter Aircraft and for the F-14 entry, the aircraft is hailed as being so stable that it is "spin proof" :icon_lol:
gotta wonder how they messed that up...
At the time, they believed that the aircraft was spinproof. Then they lost one at Pax and found out that it had a nasty flat spin mode (upright and inverted) that appeared to be unrecoverable although two separate gents claim to have successfully recovered from them. It was the top boldface procedure and every Tomcat rider could recite the steps in their sleep (ejecting the RIO to get the nose down in upright spin was not a step, although it was talked about in the Ready Room). Problem was if spin got fully developed, both pilot and aircrew would likely be incapacitated and out of position to eject so you had to do something fast. Motors are so far apart and the TF30 in the A model so stall prone that loss of one presented real danger of departing and starting the dance.