Like the early British sales pitches for the Harrier that said VIFFing was their magic move, it's more likely to make you a grape ripe for plucking.
Sell the farm! Sell the farm!!!
Wait, he didn't "buy it."
Ut-uh....
*Pluck*
Like the early British sales pitches for the Harrier that said VIFFing was their magic move, it's more likely to make you a grape ripe for plucking.
Sell the farm! Sell the farm!!!
Wait, he didn't "buy it."
Ut-uh....
*Pluck*
Well against an adversary that just goes level across the horizon, or someone that doesn't understand fundamental BFM, selling that farm would give them such a helmet fire it may work. It's all about getting that first shot. Follow on BFM may be an issue if it doesn't work though. Where's a Harrier guy to chime in when you need one?
Why does everything always devolve into a BFM debate around here? It's fun, but not really relevant in todays war.
Please begin the "But if we go to war with China tomorrow......" discussion now, please.
Because IT IS fun??? Because IT IS one of the most basic tactical skills there is .... aside from bombing/strafing ........ Why does everything always devolve into a BFM debate around here? It's fun....
Not surprisingly, we haven't been doing much of this lately since we've spent the majority of our time doing ISR and whacking the Muj.
Why does everything always devolve into a BFM debate around here? It's fun, but not really relevant in todays war.
Please begin the "But if we go to war with China tomorrow......" discussion now, please.
VT-86 question guys... I'm an AF pilot that's interested in flying an IP tour with the Navy. I've heard WSO/CSO/NFO advanced training is transitioning to the T-45. Is it just going to be a Navy/USMC deal or are the AF studs going to be flying in the T-45 too? If the answer is yes, what timeframe are they looking at starting this? I'd be interested in a T-45 gig to train newly minted WSOs going to my MWS. Thanks for your replies.
Initially the 45 is supposed to replace the T-2; AF studs don't fly it down here anyway
They never learn, do they???22 years ago when I applied for AOCS the interviewing officer while going over the training track said the T-2's and A-4's would be gone from VT-10 and VT-86 by the time I got there and replaced by T-45's!
22 years ago when I applied for AOCS the interviewing officer while going over the training track said the T-2's and A-4's would be gone from VT-10 and VT-86 by the time I got there and replaced by T-45's!
Initially the 45 is supposed to replace the T-2; AF studs don't fly it down here anyway (AF wings the Mudhen guys right after T-39s and sends them to Moody for IFF instead of doing the ATM flights in the T-2).
The most recent brief from the new senior AF liaison down here is that the AF studs will not be in the T-45 even if they replace the T-39s as well; Big Blue is apparently concerned about more instruction from INs as opposed to IPs and will be transitioning everyone over to a T-6/T-1 program when they get Randolph moved down here in 2010 (setting up a separate training group on the flightline instead of leaving AF studs in TW-6).
Is there talk of replacing the T-39's with T-45's? I would prefer to see another biz jet type replace it but I am not sure how much it would cost.