I say let the states make their own gun laws.
We tried that with civil rights .... didnt work all that hot.
I say let the states make their own gun laws.
Yea, a little bit different animal though too.We tried that with civil rights .... didnt work all that hot.
Yea, that's the kicker. It may not violate the 2nd Amendment now, but what happens down the road when the Supreme Courts decides a case as a result of this legislation which in turn establishes precedence for even another case down the road.As a general rule I support this, as long as it is not in conflict with the 2nd Amendment.
Most states pre-civil war were free states, still didn't help the slaves living in the other states... Individual rights should not be granted at any level but protected at all levels.Most state constitution 2A clauses that I've seen tend to specifically define the right as an individual right.
That's not true in California. We still have a crappy AWB here.
But if we could only ban all firearms there would be no violent crime...
I say let the states make their own gun laws.
Maybe the people of Chicago will stand up against this measure. If not, well.....that just sucks.Funny thing is, the Illinois Bill of Rights has a copy of the US 2nd Ammendment...and right now Cook County (Chicago) is trying to ban firearms period. Apparently a Constitution doesn't mean anything to lower governments i.e. DC, Chicago, etc.
Maybe the people of Chicago will stand up against this measure. If not, well.....that just sucks.
Maybe the people of Chicago will stand up against this measure. If not, well.....that just sucks.