Cool gun. Freak job of a chick.
I kinda figured MB would go for her. She's a welder/machinist after all.....doesn't seem prone to a manatee inspired growth spirt any time soon. She could be high speed high drag but it would be a fun ride while it lasted
If only I could talk her and the current GF into.........
Nah. They'd BOTH shoot me for asking.
Ballistically, I wonder how the round performs? Anyone have a link? I imagine certain people among he firearms community will dismiss the round as niche/gimmick/not having enough 'stopping power', but if it chews bad guys into hamburger, I'm game.
As for the girl, I'll just quote my wife: "Oh. Yeah. Hell yeah. I'd go there. Do you have any more pics of her?"
A tatted up vixen versus my (very) tanned Rican girl... If they sold tickets, I'd buy them all, just to keep it all to myself.
Hard to see the need for the 4.6mm round with the existence of FN's 5.7 filling a similar role. I'd be hard-pressed to consider relying on a cartridge with ballistics similar to the .22 Magnum (but smaller). Good thing there's 50 of them (P90 magazine). One has to worry about the "ice-pick" wound effects if not a subscriber to the energy-dump theory.Wiki is a good place to start as usual. At first glance it kinda looks like a solution looking for a problem when compared with a short suppressed 5.56. Except maybe when you factor in a need for a very small, very accurate, hi capacity weapon that is almost completely silent. Overpenatration is not as much a problem with the 5.56 as many assume but I'd guess that would be even less of a concern with the 5.7 and the 4.6. With spec ops shooters the "stopping power" discussion might not be as much of a big deal because everybody ends up with one in the head whether they need it or not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HK_4.6×30mm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.7x28mm
[*]
Fun fact: The MP7 can also help defend against the Combine. Anyone...anyone...yeah, I'm a dork.