I'll get the Lvl V Wiskey Drinking patch ordered up right away.
Sign me up.
I'll get the Lvl V Wiskey Drinking patch ordered up right away.
So this is by no means the first time Big Navy has cracked down on flight suit patches.
Maybe I should rephrase. It's not sea lawyering, it's English comprehension, which many in the P-3 world round about the time I was leaving the fleet for VTs, lacked. I actually got into this debate with our CMC right before I left when he was standing around saying that we (aircrew, which he was not) wouldn't be able to have any more "fun" patches. I asked him if he had read the reg. He had, but lacked the basic English skills and frame of reference to know what was meant by that single sentence. When I explained it to him he basically said, "Well, we'll see about that" with a tone of voice that said, "I don't like being corrected by JOs" and/or "I'll make the uniform regs whatever I want and you can't stop me."
Then this too shall pass....
"Poopie trim!"
words
I think the thread started off as a complaint about how NWUs have replaced khakis (particularly shipboard washed khakis). My particular beef is that in an effort to "fit in" around the five sided circus we've adopted a camouflaged uniform to satisfy the hunger for all things "warrior"...
To the flight suit question - I prefer the rules the way they are. Bags are okay for "brief" stops. I know some of you sea lawyers will contest what constitutes a 'brief" stop. If you need to ask - it's probably not ok. The people who are excited about the bag changes coming in October so they can go out in town wearing them - I suspect are people who really want to make sure people know they're aviators. Really want to be seen out in town in a bag. Maybe even carried helmet bags to books a million in Pcola to "study" (read: be seen).
Paint me a grumpy old jerk though.
To the flight suit question - I prefer the rules the way they are. Bags are okay for "brief" stops. I know some of you sea lawyers will contest what constitutes a 'brief" stop. If you need to ask - it's probably not ok. The people who are excited about the bag changes coming in October so they can go out in town wearing them - I suspect are people who really want to make sure people know they're aviators. Really want to be seen out in town in a bag. Maybe even carried helmet bags to books a million in Pcola to "study" (read: be seen).Paint me a grumpy old jerk though.
And we won't be able to go anywhere in a bag we don't go already.
FUBIJAR in effect.
I was shocked to see the NWU replace Khaki. I thought it was only going to be a dungaree/swojammie replacement. I was ok with wash khaki on the boat. I wore it almost as much as my bag. In my day at NASNI, on the VS side anyway, you wore khaki until you had a brief. Maybe hung around in it for some time after the hop if it was convenient, but eventually went back to the khaki. I can't see anyone doing that with NWUs.I think the thread started off as a complaint about how NWUs have replaced khakis (particularly shipboard washed khakis). My particular beef is that in an effort to "fit in" around the five sided circus we've adopted a camouflaged uniform to satisfy the hunger for all things "warrior"....
Agree 100%. It was more traditional, unifying, and just plain fun when we could do just about anything to our flight suits and jackets. Squadron shit hots, club bags, cruise patches, foreign military patches, etc. I would have never traded that to wear my bag out in town. Be careful what you wish for.To the flight suit question - I prefer the rules the way they are. Bags are okay for "brief" stops. I know some of you sea lawyers will contest what constitutes a 'brief" stop. If you need to ask - it's probably not ok. The people who are excited about the bag changes coming in October so they can go out in town wearing them - I suspect are people who really want to make sure people know they're aviators. Really want to be seen out in town in a bag. Maybe even carried helmet bags to books a million in Pcola to "study" (read: be seen).