• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

The Sikorsky Knighthawk

Status
Not open for further replies.

Woodson

Registered User
To you helo pilots, I think your job i aazing, an i would like to fly either the Ah-1 or the H-53 for the Corps after college. I do have a queston. What is the deal with the MH-60S Knighthawk? I thought the MH designaton was reserved for Special Operations helos.(?) From what i've, the Knighthawk is to replace the HH-60 in Maritime SAR and CSAR, the H-46 in COD and shipborn transportation, and to replace the SH-60B and F models (which i thought was the job of the Romeo upgrade)Will somebody please clarify things!!!
 

Gatordev

Well-Known Member
pilot
Site Admin
Contributor
Since things are always WAY fluid in the helo community, this may have been switched around a bit while I've been gone, but here's the breakdown. The Knighthawks are replacing the -46s to fullfil the HC mission, but they are also doing CSAR. I have a friend who was one of the first nuggets in the Sierra, and he had said they were doing SEAL insertions all the time. I'm not sure what the future holds for the Hotel (HH-60H), but I doubt it's going anywhere soon. The "plan" for the Romeo is to replace both HSL (-60B) and HS (the -60F part of HS). The catch is that it's going to take forever. The last official word I got when I was back in the RAG was 2008, but I've recently heard that our Bravos are going to fly till 2015, so who knows when it will all happen.
 

bomber

Registered User
I flew H-46s out in Guam, so I was around when the first fleet MH-60s showed up. For a long time, they were called CH-60, but then somebody up the line somewhere changed it to MH for "multimission," since they'll be doing so much more than just cargo stuff (although 46s did pretty much the same thing the new 60s will do, except for CSAR). When the first batch of 60s got out to Guam, they had "CH-60S" painted on the tail, so that had to be fixed. Now they all say MH, but there's a little square of paint around the M that doesn't match the rest of the airframe.

Also, I don't think the Knighthawk name is official, but it'll probably stick. It's a tribute to the old Seaknight, and since most 60S guys used to fly 46s, they like it. The Air Force has a Nighthawk too, possibly even the MH-60 Nighthawk, and there was some discussion on whether or not we could use the same designation and name, but that never got too far. So it looks like Navy Sierras will be MH-60 Knighthawks for good.

As far as the plan for all helos, it's quite a bit more complicated than just replacing 46s and old 60s (and 53s and 3s and whatever else) with new 60s. There's going to be some major realignment in the helo communities, but I don't think anybody knows what's going to happen for sure yet. Last rumor I heard, HC and HS were going to be combined, and the squadrons would deploy with the carriers, like HS does now, but then send dets out to the CLF ships (and possibly amphibs) like HC does now. I have no idea what they're planning for HSL and HM. Like gatordev said, "who knows"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top