check out SWO MENTALITY ???SteveG75 said:....If you want to check out real SWO mentality ...
I thought we were not suppose to post pornography here ...

check out SWO MENTALITY ???SteveG75 said:....If you want to check out real SWO mentality ...
A4sForever said:check out SWO MENTALITY ???
I thought we were not suppose to post pornography here ...
ROGER BALL !!![]()
Brett327 said:Right on, Meat. Everything except the part about you being handsome. BTW, I hear Clappy is back and going through the RAG.
Brett
Begin threadjack that belongs in an IM...Yeah, the RAG was down here doing CQ last week, got to go out with the boys - standard progression from South Beach to Tony's. Lots of turnover and a couple hot female cones! That's gotta be a first...End threadjack.SteveG75 said:Yeah, heard that too. Just got my hands on the Dec bubba list. Did I ever tell you how I did not get my DH ticket punched because we had too many hinges. Two of my competitors just got slid a year out of my selection group. :icon_rage
Of course, I saw some of the guys ahead of me that failed to select and there are some good people in that category.I guess if everything was a guarantee, life would be pretty boring.
Well said, "ROAD"; the best commentary I have seen on this thread as it relates to the original question.Road Program said:Can I pipe in here?
Yes, as a former Nuke, my sentiments exactly. Despite apparent perceptions to the contrary, I was never trying to advocate SWO-N over NFO, just trying to get a detailed inside perspective on the latter, for the sake of an undecided soul (J.T.).Road Program said:There was a guy in my API class who was a prior enlisted Nuke and I asked him why he didn't go back to the Nuke world as a SWO. His response: "Are you crazy?!"
I never thought you were trying to advocate SWO over NFO. I said with your attitude, you would be better off switching to SWO. I still think so - aren't first impressions a b!tch to overcome? There is a lesson here for you....nfo2b said:Despite apparent perceptions to the contrary, I was never trying to advocate SWO-N over NFO
Okay, fair enough, but let's get something straight--this has nothing to do with attitude. That's like me saying that your aversion to broccoli, because you think it causes warts, is a "bad attitude." That's not attitude, that your dislike for warts opposing your ill-informed knowledge of brocolli. That's all I'm doing here--juxtaposing my obviously ill informed knowledge of P-3/E-2C NFO life with my distaste for boring monotonous work. It's not attitude, man. Give me a break and prove my assumptions wrong, as others here have done. As I stated when I posted this thread, I don't know much about the NFO community other than what I've "heard", and we all know how valuable that kind of knowledge is. So educate me, don't castigate me. And please don't talk to me like I'm some sort of green little airman apprentice b!tch boy. I may be new to Naval Aviation, but I'm certainly not new to the Navy. Is that a fair request? There may be a lesson or two here for you as well...HAL Pilot said:I never thought you were trying to advocate SWO over NFO. I said with your attitude, you would be better off switching to SWO. I still think so - aren't first impressions a b!tch to overcome? There is a lesson here for you....
SteveG75 said:As a wise and handsome post-DH (the JO's will say there is no such person), I'll try to answer some of these.
SteveG75 said:
- Only 20% of sea-going career on a Nuke platform
So a SWO-N really doesn't go to sea much, is that your point? As an aviator, you can get through a CO tour (~18 years) and only have three sea tours (~8 years). OK, so that is 44%. But in those 8 years, you will probably do 4 deployments and some workups totalling ~2.5 years at sea (14% at sea). The rest of the time, you will be flying at home. Most of us spend more time at sea than that, but we do love to fly off ships.
Apples and oranges here. SWO's don't pick a ship type and stay with that type throughout their career. Every tour is typically different from the last (both in billet and platform). Are you saying that a P-3 NFO can do his first fleet tour and then do a tour in an EA-6B squadron for his second, and then another one for his third, etc? That is what he meant by "variety."SteveG75 said:[*]Variety of sea-duty (i.e. first sea tour can be ANYTHING, not just CVN
Aviation choices: P-3 land based, TACAIR CV, TACAIR Expeditionary (EA-6B), HS (CV), HSL (small boys), HC (supply ships or USNS ships). Is this an all inclusive list, probably not. Point is that there is a variety.
I think any of the URL's have a wide variety when it comes to shore duty. SWO's even have billets at Fallon too.SteveG75 said:[*]Large variety of shore-duty assignments
Places that I know JO's have gone to after their first tour:
RAG instructor
VT instructor
Pentagon
Navy Warfare Development Command (Newport)
PG School
Academy instructor
Tactical Training Group Pacific (Pt Loma, very nice location)
Office of Naval Intelligence
NSAWC (Fallon)
NSWAC det at Nellis (all I know about this job is that some of the stuff is super classified)
Exchange tour with Luftwaffe
MISC (Missile Intelligence, Huntsville Alabama)
ROTC instructor
Flag aide
I know of even more exotic places that O-4's have gone to (usually overseas).
TrueSteveG75 said:[*]Early promotion to O-4 (SWO-N's spot promote to LCDR upon billeting to PA in about 9 yrs)
OK, normal promotion is 10 years.
Did you mean OOD (u/w)? CDO (u/w) on the carrier I was on was stood only by the O-5 types.SteveG75 said:[*]Driving ships--whether you care to admit it or not, this IS cool!
Aviators get to qualify CDO on the carrier when doing disassociated tours. Flying is also cool. Just ask a Whidbey guy about doing the VR1350/1355 combo. 1+30 hop with 1+20 of it at 500 feet, 420 knots down the Columbia River (actually down in it) and back up the spine of the Cascades (where the roadways on the mountainside are above the jet).
Agree, naval officer first.SteveG75 said:[*]EXTREMELY valuable experience for the outside job market.
Your flying skills are just one block on your fitrep. You are a Naval Officer first and that is what companies are looking for. Leadership, management skills, time management skills, ability to organize and plan, etc. Unless of course you would rather work at 3 Mile Island or United Airlines, but those are technical jobs, not leadership jobs.
Keyword there being "department." How much time did you spend doing these things as an ENS, JG, or LT? Actually, let me rephrase. How much time does the average aviator ENS, JG, or LT spend on this?SteveG75 said:[*]More leadership experience (i.e. SWO-N's spend more time managing divisions and sailors than aviators, who spend much of their "officer" time flying.
Yeah, I flew two or three times a week, about a 6 hour evolution per. I then spent another 40 hours a week or so leading my sailors and managing my department. Same as above, flying is one block on the fitrep. Being a good Naval Officer is your number one job. Your technical skill is flying or operating a nuke plant. And don't forget the 4 hours on, 16 hours off duty schedule that you will live every day as a SWO. Lots of time left for leadership there.
SteveG75 said:[*]Very little possibility of getting attrited from your training pipeline and dismissed from the Navy (unlike the current aviation pipeline situation--20% attrition? Ouch.)
Does that mean everyone makes it through the SWO pipeline? Anything worthwhile is hard to get. Wings of gold are hard to get.
Got to know and stood a lot of watch with some EA-6B NFO's. Great guys who loved their job. I gained a lot of insight into what they do up there.SteveG75 said:As for riding in the tube watching a screen. NFO's in the EA-6B and E-2 communities are commonly mission commanders. We run the show. An E-2 for command and control and a Prowler for SEAD are generally strike requirements. I have twenty strikers dependent on my ability to shut down an enemy's eyes long enough for them to put steel on target.
Yep, that is a good SWO site. However, the original poster was asking for aviators' perspectives on the perceived advantages/disadvantages of being an NFO since he himself doesn't have the experience to give his friend objective information. This post was not for him as many of the replys to the post have implied.SteveG75 said:Obviously, this is an aviation board and we enjoy what we do. If you want to check out real SWO mentality, try www.sailorbob.com .
I agree here. Doesn't make alot of sense to me either. Even if Steve W. is right, and it's all about the XO/CO preparation, 20% is still low. But that's the way it is, and that's not a bad thing (if you're a nuke!)SteveG75 said:20% of time for SWO-N is on a nuke. Sorry, doesn't make much sense to me. Like training an ECMO and only giving him one tour in Prowlers.
That's not what the "variety" point was about. It was just about that--VARIETY. Some people, like my friend, thrive on change. Various billet types (i.e. WEPS, Ops, Comms, etc.) is what SWO's can get, and that is one thing that J.T. likes about SWO.SteveG75 said:...Does that constant change make better officers? Tha is debatable.
Well, yes and no. Part of what I said here is coming from "a typical non-aviator view of an aviator's day" and part of it is coming from the voices of a couple of my fellow airdale OC's here at the unit. They said that they rarely interacted with their Div-O's because they were either flying or playing golf (and I'm not slamming this--just relaying their experiences). However, I'm smart enough to know that this has everything to do with what kind of JO you want to be. I've been enlisted for over 12 years now, so I want to be the kind of officer who is always in touch with his sailors, looking out for them, providing them with what they need/want to get the job done, and interacting with them regularly. So that's what I plan on doing. It just seems to me, from what I've heard from enlisted airdales, that this level of deckplate interaction isn't the norm in many squadrons. Could be wrong, so if I am, let me know. I believe you about your experience you just wrote, but you may be an anomaly. Doesn't matter. My point is that if a SWO doesn't have this kind of regular deckplate-level interaction, then his performance as a Div-O, and that of his Division will almost certainly suffer badly. I've seen it. I've lived it. That's just the way it is.SteveG75 said:Time with the troops. I was a department head so I said department. I had an ENS who spent more time at work than me and JO's who were division officers, personnel officers, etc who spent just as much time leading as a SWO JO. The original post sounded like a typical non-aviator view of an aviator's day.
The "pipeline" is nukese for the year of in-depth nuke schooling/training (1.5 yrs for enlisted) that a JO gets before going to his first nuke billet. One year may sound short, especially for you guys, who spend nearly 1.5yrs in flight school, but trust me, it's INTENSE. Even the enlisted pipeline is tough. So there is a decent attrition rate, but for a former enlisted nuke (like J.T.), there's very little chance for attrition. And I'd like to make one more comment about your response to this one above--yes, anything worth getting is worth working hard for, but I don't want to get 6 months into flight school, and have the aviation community, who already seems to be looking for reasons to filter as many SNFO's and SNA's as they can, say to me, "Sorry ENS Nfo2b, we've decided that your kerataconus isn't acceptable anymore, here's your pink slip, and have a nice day." I've been in way too long to risk ending my Naval career before I plan to. This is my biggest concern about going NFO.SteveG75 said:Attrition. I don't know what the SWO-N pipeline is. Is there little chance for attrition there?
I apologize if I didn't make myself clear. This post was not about a future SWO slamming the aviation community, it was about an undecided future officer trying to gain some useful information about a community that niether he nor his friend (me) know very little about. The points I listed about SWO advantages were posted solely for the purpose of extracting comparable advantages of going NFO, not for the sake of purporting SWO to be any better than NFO in any way. Like I said, we both know what to expect from SWO, but not from NFO. That's all that this post is about.SteveG75 said:The impression that I got was that the original post was going NFO and his friend was going SWO or SWO-N. They were both prior enlisted. His friend was talking smack about NFO's and he wanted to know what we thought about those points that his friend had.
Yeah, what's been going on here? Major server issues, I guess. Time for a new webhost, Steve W.SteveG75 said:Update: 24 hours to reply due to the site not being accessible. :icon_rage