http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/31/state.department.iraq/index.html
Threw up a little in my mouth. I thought Americans worked for the Department of State
Threw up a little in my mouth. I thought Americans worked for the Department of State
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
State FSO's
- Thread starter Whalebite
- Start date
Remember that whole "to support and defend" thing
Funny, they (FSOs) take an oath quite similar to the rest of us. Perhaps they have some clause that military members don't... like if you have an allergic reaction to getting sand in your shorts.
Funny, they (FSOs) take an oath quite similar to the rest of us. Perhaps they have some clause that military members don't... like if you have an allergic reaction to getting sand in your shorts.
RetreadRand said:
They aren't being asked to do our job or bear arms. They are being asked to do their job, in an admittedly more dangerous area. Given the nature of their job, they probably won't be leaving the wire, so it isn't as dangerous as they're making it out to be. How dangerous is it working on your own in a third world country without a ring of wire and sentries to protect you from criminals and terrorists? And yes, calling it a "potential death sentence" is insulting to our servicemembers. I get the feeling these are the same people that think "foreign service" means an idyllic adventure in Western Europe.
Shocking. So we get to pick and choose now.
RetreadRand said:
You're right they are not military, but they ARE Foreign Service Officers, which is different than "regular" Civil Service employees, they are Excepted Service. If we can't force FSO's into "dangerous" places how could we ever expect to advance foreign diplomacy?
"Unless they have a valid medical reason to refuse, those who decline to go could face dismissal, it said."
Sounds like they're allowed to quit. Problem solved. It's not like they're getting brig time for refusing to go, they just have to find a job better suited to their pansy ass needs. After all, their needs are by far the most important thing...
Sounds like they're allowed to quit. Problem solved. It's not like they're getting brig time for refusing to go, they just have to find a job better suited to their pansy ass needs. After all, their needs are by far the most important thing...
These guys come from privileged backgrounds, went to Ivy League schools and dont know the meaning of sacrifice because they have never had to endure anything. Its very competitive to get into the state department so lets give all the other people who want there jobs, like me, a shot at going over there. I would love to see some job openings at the FSO positions.
How many state department officials have died under Blackwater care? Thats a big zero.
How many state department officials have died under Blackwater care? Thats a big zero.
Remember that was before the Feds started putting the screws to Blackwater. Something tells me that they might not be as effective anymore.
RetreadRand said:
Well, there are very big differences between what many military personnel do in Iraq and Afghanistan and what the FSO's do. First and foremost, they are not serving in combat capacities and only a minority are on the Provisional Reconstruction Teams and in the field regularly. Msot of them spend mos tof their time in the Green Zone and are not under a dire threat.
As for not being in the military, FSO's hold commissions just like a military officer, with all of the obligations and responsibilities that a commission entails. I don't know many FSO's personally but I know a lot people who have worked with them and apparently many do have an entitlement attitude.
Like others who have pointed it out, they took an oath and they are serving their country, and their country needs them in Iraq. They don't have to like it, but if you take the King's coin.........
That probably has more to do with where State employees go and the work they do, and often guarded at a ratio of 10 to 1.
This "revolt of the FSO's" is so indicative of the problems with our mission in Iraq. How can the US effectively nation build when the State Dept can't man their billets. The majority of the problems in Iraq are diplomatic in nature, yet our supposedly preeminent diplomats are publicly shirking their responsibilities. WTF? They are officers of the United States government and need to start acting like it or resign.
I heard some of the recording. It was truly disgusting. FSOs actually hold a "Commission" in the Foreign Service. They are not civil servants in the classic (and technical) sense. They either go or face termination. They do not have to agree with the war or any other foreign policy of the USA any more then a military member. They serve the Administration in office at the time by helping to craft American foreign policy and then advancing that policy whether they agree or not. If I were SEC STATE I'd put anyone who challenged the posting to Iraq on the list for a 2 year unaccompanied hardship posting in Buttcrackistan. No sense in firing them. They become martyrs the press will flock to.
phrogpilot73
Well-Known Member
Hmmm. I think the Marine Corps sent me to Buttcrackistan. It's truly lovely this time of year.
At least they taught us to spell in the Ivey League.
