Too the OP-
Option B, no question. You can have the best case in the world (i.e. more than telling the judge "I wasn't speeding") and if the judge had a bad day you'll still end up being found responsible. Having a clean record and points off are far more important than just paying the fine. I wish a ticket was just a ticket, around here one ticket ends up costing you 1200+ in insurance surcharges over the next 6 years.
I can't tell from your story, but it sounds to me like you were hit with LIDAR rather than RADAR. That doesn't excuse their inability to provide the documentation, but just as a FYI for future reference, at 1000ft (despite what the officer said) the beam from a LIDAR gun is well under the width of your car. Plus they have a red dot sight to pick out your car. That being said most of the common LIDAR guns are around 1.5-3.0 mils so once the range gets over 1500ft it starts to get a bit dodgy. In reality they are suppose to visually estimate then confirm but more often than not they just point and shoot.
Option B, no question. You can have the best case in the world (i.e. more than telling the judge "I wasn't speeding") and if the judge had a bad day you'll still end up being found responsible. Having a clean record and points off are far more important than just paying the fine. I wish a ticket was just a ticket, around here one ticket ends up costing you 1200+ in insurance surcharges over the next 6 years.
I went to court, fought my ticket, and lost. I asked for documentation that the cop had calibrated his radar gun, and the documentation could not be provided. The judge said that the cop's word was enough, so no official documentation was necessary to uphold the ticket. I was also on a four-lane highway on a holiday weekend. I was allegedly gunned from over 1000 feet away. I asked what the beam spread was at that distance, and basically it was more than enough to have gunned another vehicle, or at least have some interference. The cop was asked who he gunned, and he said it was me, so once again, the judge relied on his testimony as an "officer of the court."
I can't tell from your story, but it sounds to me like you were hit with LIDAR rather than RADAR. That doesn't excuse their inability to provide the documentation, but just as a FYI for future reference, at 1000ft (despite what the officer said) the beam from a LIDAR gun is well under the width of your car. Plus they have a red dot sight to pick out your car. That being said most of the common LIDAR guns are around 1.5-3.0 mils so once the range gets over 1500ft it starts to get a bit dodgy. In reality they are suppose to visually estimate then confirm but more often than not they just point and shoot.