I'd have thought that patch of ocean would have tons of surface shipping down there, if not SAR specifically.Yes and no, landing it was the best option and from what they knew at the time making it to Taiwan or the Philippines would have been dicey. Things could have been done better before they landed but nothing on that plane was worth anyone's life.
Most, if not all, of the crew likely would have died if that had happened. Hundreds of miles from any friendly (or competent) SAR and spread out miles from each other, those that made it out, it would have been a disaster.
Ditching was the other option and the preferred one over bailing out in the P-3, but only one P-3 ditched without fatalities and no one had ever ditched an EP-3. It was an interesting topic of discussion in the squadron when the question came up among aircrew even before the incident, with most pilots not wanting to risk it with the extra weight and not knowing what the antenna on the belly would do (just come off, rip up the bottom?). And that still left you hundreds of miles from the closest friendly and competent SAR.
BTW, similar scenarios were commonly run through during qualification boards and the command consensus was the crew's safety and survival were paramount. That almost certainly played a significant part in the crew's decision-making.
Are you saying they'd have died in the bailout, or waiting for rescue? Winter conditions at the time?
The E-2 has jumped out of successfully a bunch of times.