Good discussion. I think some people are instantly inclined to think a severe punishment is appropriate because they don't like what she did. I can understand that, but when you break it down, she failed to follow a regulation/order/instruction/etc. Do we take every Sailor to mast for not following the rules? Depends, doesn't it? The organization also has to be fair and consistent. If Airman Timmy's hair is out of regs, do we send him to mast? Probably not the first thing that comes to mind. We correct Airman Timmy and see where it goes. In a vacuum, we're just guessing at some of these things that would go into the CO's decision.
That's why there's a process for this. Start with DRB and the CPOs. Is she combative or does she realize she's made a big mistake? Are there extenuating or aggravating circumstances? If after all of this, she needs to go to mast, so be it. I'm just concerned that many people are jumping right to the last step in the process. You have people on FB saying she should be dishonorably discharged. Of course, that's ridiculous, but it goes to the fact that they hate what she did without really understanding the mechanics of it.