• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Road to 350: What Does the US Navy Do Anyway?

Unclear just what the correlation is between American shipbuilding capacity and the demand for civilian mariners. That's a weird headline that belies a poor understanding of the subject matter.
 
Again, he’s not recommending an active naval vessel, but a mothballed vessel repurposed for disaster relief…no hot rocks involved.
Meant to get back to this sooner, but as you said, the idea was for dedicated humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, ie, the ship would be used year round with an emphasis on hurricanes during that time of the year. Figured either State or DOT might have a better chance of funding, anything going through the Pentagon would have a low priority. Perhaps using something like the National Security Multi- Mission Vessels like Empire State VII that DOT is currently building might be better than an older LSD - although the ships only have a single helo pad, they do have roll on / roll off capability.


Also found this feature from USNI when in 1929 the carrier USS Lexington went pierside and supplied power to the city of Tacoma for a month (no hot rocks required)


1763332237210.jpeg
USS Lexington (CV-2) supplying power to Tacoma, January 1930
 
Meant to get back to this sooner, but as you said, the idea was for dedicated humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, ie, the ship would be used year round with an emphasis on hurricanes during that time of the year. Figured either State or DOT might have a better chance of funding, anything going through the Pentagon would have a low priority. Perhaps using something like the National Security Multi- Mission Vessels like Empire State VII that DOT is currently building might be better than an older LSD - although the ships only have a single helo pad, they do have roll on / roll off capability.


Also found this feature from USNI when in 1929 the carrier USS Lexington went pierside and supplied power to the city of Tacoma for a month (no hot rocks required)


View attachment 43917
USS Lexington (CV-2) supplying power to Tacoma, January 1930
Thanks for sharing. Looks like a unique situation that the ship lent itself well to solving.
 
Back to shipbuilding, a good article this morning.

Interesting. I can say that the sub yard at Portsmouth (Kittery) is receiving construction funds by the truck load. With the exception of certain historic buildings, the entire yard is getting an overhaul including a $1.7 billion dry dock expansion.
 
I feel like they need to adopt a "Schedule as an Independent Variable" approach and let that be the constraint that drives designs until we get numbers down range up reasonably. That means schedule over capability. Develop kits that can convert commercial craft to a minimal capability, for example. Develop bespoke designs that can be manufactured at non-traditional ship and boat yards fast. Quantity now then quality (and hopefully still quantity) later.
 
Back to shipbuilding, a good article this morning.

Interesting. I can say that the sub yard at Portsmouth (Kittery) is receiving construction funds by the truck load. With the exception of certain historic buildings, the entire yard is getting an overhaul including a $1.7 billion dry dock expansion.

The article mentions the large overhaul/upgrade of the shipyards and I presume that is part of it, but I also question the credibility of some of the assertions given the partisan nature of the author. Reminds me a bit of Hendrix.
 
Back
Top