That's why I asked the question, guys .... inquiring minds and all. I'm still not "sold" ... I read other stuff, too --- much of it critical. But I respect the perspective of knowledgeable people and especially .... (Phrog) .... operators. But the -46 ??? 1950's and early 1960's design (?)  ... I'm quite sure the -22 would be "impressive" by comparison. 
 
How about combat?? The crucible. That's where it counts ... Generals and Congressmen won't be flyin' it .... into a hot LZ.
 
Thanks 'Joe and 'Phrog --- seriously --- some people on this forum think if you ask a question or offer a different opinion --- you are "arguing". That's not the case, I assure you. Why am I even saying this .... ???
 
I appreciate your illumination.
 
		
		
	
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
				
			How about combat?? The crucible. That's where it counts ... Generals and Congressmen won't be flyin' it .... into a hot LZ.
Thanks 'Joe and 'Phrog --- seriously --- some people on this forum think if you ask a question or offer a different opinion --- you are "arguing". That's not the case, I assure you. Why am I even saying this .... ???
I appreciate your illumination.
	
	
	
	