A big part of the reason they added the 'C' in 1993.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
Netflix recommendations?
- Thread starter Randy Daytona
- Start date
A big part of the reason they added the 'C' in 1993.
Apparently, this movie is drawing some attention from the Pentagon. I hope they don't expend too much energy on it. I thought it was an okay movie; kind of thought-provoking and was attempting to present an air of realism but obviously some creative liberties were taken. The ending was a bit disappointing.
Is that the same Annie Jacobsen that wrote the column referenced here about witnessing a hijacking dry-run in the early 2000s?
Are you responding to me or Randy?
The fundamentals of military, appointed, and elected officials having to make critical decisions and extremely time compressed situation is pretty much on point. And I think that is the point.
One thing I thought was super realistic was the SECDEF having a moment where he realized he was still on mute in a video conference.
I liked that the movie was divided into 3 different perspectives that kept the clock ticking.
As a sidenote, has there been any thought to bringing back / updating something like the Nike Sprint point defense interceptor rocket? Although it would be overwhelmed in a massive attack, it might be useful in a situation the movie describes where there is only 1 or 2 terrorist / rogue nations missiles inbound?
