I was being somewhat facetious, but the underlying point is that sometimes there’s value in bringing a Sailor all the way through the process, then not awarding punishment. Because in their case, the “oh shit” moment of going through the process is enough to get them to internalize that they screwed up.If there is an element of theater required at XOI or Mast, IMO, you're doing it wrong. It should be a very direct and transparent conversation between the XO/CO and the respondent. Points can be made and feelings expressed without humiliating the Sailor and embarrassing yourself.
And there is absolutely an element of theater to the mast process. You clear out a space, put signs around the decks saying “keep quiet,” put on dress uniforms, make the Sailor formally report, and go through a script. That’s theater. Ceremony. Ritual. And rituals can be powerful tools for shaping human behavior. Otherwise, a CO would just fill out a report chit in their office. The process itself, by its nature, is as much theater as legal procedure.
I in no way am advocating abusing the process to humiliate a Sailor. I’m advocating using the full psychological power of the ceremonies we’re given, in a professional manner, to reform a Sailor by making them have that moment of realization that what they did was a really, really dumb thing.
Oh, and I’m also advocating having an escort so the Sailor doesn’t go UA for 29 days.
