• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

JCS Chair Gen. Pace leaving in September

It's ALWAYS politics (read: power) and/or money. In this case ... politics triumphed.

So what's worth fighting for these days, anyway ... ??? The current administration is starting to resemble the second coming of Gerald Ford, at least for me ....
 
Navy Officers Better Suited To Lead Our Nation's Forces Over AF, Army, and Marine

Excellent article in today's LA Times commenting on the prevailing thinking that Naval Officers are simply better suited for senior strategic level command than our Army, AF, and Marine brethren.

Article goes on saying history seems to support this - and that Marine, AF, and Army Officers are geared more to winning the details of a ground campaign, but their training and culture might not be geared to large scale strategic leadership that DOD needs right now...

Thoughts? Is Gates right?
 
It seems that the civilian leadership at least thinks so. With Naval/Marine officers in the CJCS VCJCS, and in several high profile Unified Commands, the Navy/Marine Corps seem to be running the show for the time being.
 
Sea Change?

statesman said:
It seems that the civilian leadership at least thinks so. With Naval/Marine officers in the CJCS VCJCS, and in several high profile Unified Commands, the Navy/Marine Corps seem to be running the show for the time being.
Click to expand...

Sure does look like a sea change (no pun intended) with "Naval" services getting the majority of 9 Combatant Commands after being minority for quite some time

PACOM - ADM Keating (second COCOM)
CENTCOM - ADM Fallon (second COCOM and 4th four star assignment)
SOUTHCOM - ADM Stavridis (youngest 4 star on the block; watch this guy for where he goes next)
SOCOM - ADM Olsen (first SEAL 4 star)
NORTHCOM - GEN Cartwright (next Vice?)

Interesting that Marines have been moving more and more into 4 star billets never available to them in past decade (they have now served as CJCS, VCJCS, EUCOM, CENTCOM, SOUTHCOM, JFCOM, and STRATCOM). Likewise, Admirals have also been moving into COCOM assignments traditionally held by other services as of late (SOUTHCOM, NORTHCOM, SOCOM, and CENTCOM)
 
My wife and I have discussed this in depth, I personally think that the current administration is trying to lay the blame for everything in Iraq with Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld named Pace to be CJCS, hence the reason he's going... Rummy is their scapegoat right now. Again, just my opinion.
 
snake020 said:
What's the chance the current vice CNO (aviator) will get it?
Click to expand...

That all depends on what Gates thinks of him (and White House). Some people would call that politics, but SECDEF runs Dept of Defense and he gets to choose who gets the nomination.
 
heyjoe said:
That all depends on what Gates thinks of him (and White House). Some people would call that politics, but SECDEF runs Dept of Defense and he gets to choose who gets the nomination.
Click to expand...

And THAT would be called .... what??? :D

Politics by another name??? Politics in uniform??? I'll call it politics. Unless rank competency now reigns @ DoD ... :D
 
A4sForever said:
And THAT would be called .... what??? :D

Politics by another name??? Politics in uniform??? I'll call it politics. Unless rank competency now reigns @ DoD ... :D
Click to expand...

Not all politics...each service chief maintains their "stable" of flag officers and gets to nominate their candidate for top spots. SECDEF can interview whomever he likes and picks whoever he likes. Same process is used within the service for other flag positions on down to flag aide de camp and other positions. Top folks get to pick whomever they feel is best suited for position and perhaps more importantly, who they think they are compatible with (or vice versa). Politics? Not entirely, but it does get political as EVERY position above two stars is subject to Senate approval just like cabinet positions (and supreme court nominations) and that can get very political.
 
heyjoe said:
Not all politics......Politics? Not entirely, but it ... can get very political.
Click to expand...
Sure, Joe ... sure ... :D

Remember ... Johnny Lehman was in my backseat once ... when even a 1.1 hour ACM "interlude" could get one an inquiry from his staff ... :D

*sigh* ... but as usual, my skills were lacking at this:
cowlipshm5.jpg
 
A4sForever said:
Sure, Joe ... sure ... :D

Remember ... Johnny Lehman was in my backseat once ... when even a 1.1 hour ACM "interlude" could get one an inquiry from his staff ... :D

*sigh* ... but as usual, my skills were lacking at this:

cowlipshm5.jpg
Click to expand...

Sometimes, the flag officer that gets the nod isn't a result of a direct political connection or interest, but rather because the question gets asked, "Will you support the administration without question?" A few gents have been ideal candidates, but their response was no so they were passed over in favor of someone who pledged blind loyalty.
 
heyjoe said:
Sometimes, the flag officer that gets the nod isn't a result of a direct political connection or interest, but rather because the question gets asked, "Will you support the administration without question?" A few gents have been ideal candidates, but their response was no so they were passed over in favor of someone who pledged blind loyalty.
Click to expand...
Roger that ... one "exception" to the "system", as I see it (and there's others -- once in a while) ... is/was John Nathman. I'm sure he was "political" to the extent necessary, but he was also "rank competency" at its finest ... :) ... John is/was a good man, in or out of uniform.
 
heyjoe said:
Not all politics....
Click to expand...

Edjumecate me. Sounded like ALL politics to me. SECDEF said he was not nominating General Pace because the politicians (I would add media) would not tolerate it, having nothing to do with the Generals's performance et al.

While I recognize that SECDEF inherited General Pace and may want "his own man", fair enough and he does have the right, the mural that was painted was all political. I actually thought rather sad.

I quickly add that we, at least I, do not know, the view of General Pace in the matter.
 
The Chief said:
Edjumecate me. Sounded like ALL politics to me. SECDEF said he was not nominating General Pace because the politicians (I would add media) would not tolerate it, having nothing to do with the Generals's performance et al.

I quickly add that we, at least I, do not know, the view of General Pace in the matter.
Click to expand...

Decision to not renominate Pace was driven by politics and I haven't heard his view either, but I can't imagine anyone would want to be roasted by an opposition Congress using you as a pawn and subjecting your family to the spectacle on C-SPAN

The part I don't subscribe to as being totally political is civilian leadership deciding who they want in key Combatant Command positions and as service chiefs. Squadron COs pick who they want as Department Heads and Div/Branch Os and usually try to lobby for best talent for their squadron. This is similar to our civilian leadership selecting flag officers for nominations to top positions. the comfirmation process is certainly conducted by our democratic/political process, but selection and nomination process is no different than what occursd at much lower levels. If you consider that all political, then fine. I consider it a bit different and positions in civilian work/industry are hardly less so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top