• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Hot new helicopter/rotorcraft news

I wouldn’t expect that much difference. The H was just a stripped down B. Suspect that they will do the same.
Agreed, but to my limited knowledge, the stripping will be less thorough. While the sonar and buoy launcher are obvious deletes, I expect the SO console to remain (kinda like H), but also radar, and I'm not sure you can order a Romeo without the ESM antennas.
 
I'm curious about the cabin config in these new Romeos!

Probably similiar to the Dane's CG versions.

and I'm not sure you can order a Romeo without the ESM antennas.

I was wondering if ESM would be a delete item. I wouldn't imagine they'd want to pay for the logistics tail of that. There are blanker plates for the arrays. Here's one of one of the RAN aircraft from a press release, there's some other photos of one of the INN aircraft (that I can't manage to find on Google right now).

fg_2848272-jdw-5937.tmb-1170x650.jpg


Not the prettiest, but probably cheaper than redoing the airframe.

The article mentions the lack of weather radar, but Romeo does have weather radar capability, it just has to be turned on in the software. I'm not sure if that's made it into the domestic AOP by now.
 

I wonder if that means it also needs another black box. It was supposed to be delivered in one of the export versions in 2022-ish. The first three off the line didn't have the capability, so I wasn't able to see it in action.
 
Honestly, from talking to my USCG buds, -60T availability lately has been pretty bad. The SLEP program and reuse of old HH-60H airframes didn't work out as hoped. So new -60Rs off the assembly line is probably the best thing going.
 
Good to know we can still win a race to the bottom.
What data are you basing that off of? What, specifically, do you object to? I actually want to know, because I've flown these 66s and they seem like great trainers to me. I've also flown with the IPs from Helicopter Institute and I'll put them up against anyone at Whiting any day. I'm serious about this. The entire contract is up for rebid next year so if you have something more concrete than, "That's not the way I did it back in my day." I want to know what it is so that I can make sure the contract addresses it.
 
Last edited:
What data are you basing that off of? What, specifically, do you object to? I actually want to know, because I've flown these 66s and they seem like great trainers to me. I've also flown with the IPs from Helicopter Institute and I'll put them up against anyone at Whiting any day. I'm serious about this. The entire contract is up for rebid next year so if you have something more concrete than, "That's not the way I did it back in my day." I want to know what it is so that I can make sure the contract addresses it.
If you are asking if I have done an in depth study of training helicopters for military purposes, no, I have not. I rather doubt the Helicopter Institute has either. But that isn’t my point, I have zero complaints about the instructors there and believe COPT-R to be a very good idea.

But that isn’t it. I disagree that the Robinson product is a sound military trainer, and yes, I have hours in the R-22, -44, and -66. Here is some actual data for you…since 1982, there have been 512 deaths Robinson crashes worldwide. How might the Bell 206 compare? You say the Bell 505 is for doctors and weekend fliers, I say the Robinson is for low rent tour operators, not demanding military training.

I get it, the turbine helicopter training market is in the dump right now, but Robinson is not the answer.
 
The entire contract is up for rebid next year

Any idea if they'll reword the "Part 141-like curriculum" to something more Navy-ish FTI? I know you and I had chatted about how Navy contracting doesn't always know how to correctly translate words to the real world.

I get it, the turbine helicopter training market is in the dump right now

Word I got the other day from management is that the A-Star and the -130 are currently going through IFR certification. As you've commented on before, I can see the -125 not being a contender because of it's anti-anti-clockwise problem, but the -130 is an interesting option.

I believe it was said that the -125 was first, followed by the -130, but no timeline was given (if it's even known, given the shut down).
 
Back
Top