• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Hard Power and Soft Power

Interesting take on the new National Security Strategy. Heard that Michael Anton of the Claremont institute (famed for writing the “Flight 93” article that was influential in getting Republicans behind Trump in the 2016 election vs Secretary of State Clinton) had a big part.

It does seem like a return to the Monroe Doctrine.

 
Interesting take on the new National Security Strategy. Heard that Michael Anton of the Claremont institute (famed for writing the “Flight 93” article that was influential in getting Republicans behind Trump in the 2016 election vs Secretary of State Clinton) had a big part.

It does seem like a return to the Monroe Doctrine.

It is too much political cheerleading…much like the “Trump Institute of Peace,” a rather silly naming that will dissolve in an administration or two. That said, I do think there is some room for kicking some old, and no longer functional, conventions down the road. I’m fine with pursuing the “golden dome” or whatever you want to call it, and putting Russia and China on alert that we aren’t all that afraid of their nukes (or at least make that bluff). The only reason the world is tolerating Russia’s efforts in the Ukraine is because we are afraid of their nuclear stockpiles - and I agree that saving Ukraine’s ass isn’t worth a nuclear exchange- while at the same time wishing we could treat Russia for what it is…a third rate power. I’m not sure, and the document isn’t clear on, the value of a western hemispheric defense when it ignores most of our power allies, but I also believe we need to invigorate our Pacific connections, especially South Korea, Japan, Australia, and India, against China…and current tariff policy isn’t working.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top