It is kind of inconsistent that the whole purpose of the new fitrep system is to give honest, uninflated observations of performance, but we're still playing English Composition 102 to shade the section I work picture. "Good" v. "Great" v. "Exceptional"...etc.
It's going to get worse. CMC is coming out with guidance on what you can and can't say with regards to fitrep comments and how they relate to your statistics. If you say "above average", but your profile has the MRO below average. It's going to get kicked back to you for "correction". Same for RO remarks. That sounds well and good, but the statistics are not valid in 99% of the cases, so when the RS and RO try to put their marks in context, it seems incongruent.
For instance: I wrote a fitrep on a Captain whose time in grade was about 6 months. He was doing a good job, and was above average in the squadron amongst his peers (who did not work for me). The problem was that I had previously written 3 reports on Captains. 2 were on the same Marine. All 3 reports were on FRS instructors who were top notch performers, and 2 of those reports were for their promotion to Major.
I could not honestly give the same marks to a guy who had been a Captain for 6 months. So, I wrote in section I "Despite the relative value of this report, Captain Benotz is performing at a level slightly above his peers and I would consider him an above average Marine considering his level of experience", or words to that effect. The point being, I knew he was going to have a RV of 80 (the lowest possible), but I wanted to be clear that this was a byproduct of incomplete data, and not the fault of the MRO.
If I had written that report today it would be kicked back as inaccurate. I would have to say that he is below average, or delete the remark entirely and let the board make their own conclusions.
I'm sure that somebody (probably me) will come up with a sea-lawyered new phrase to get across the same point, but it has become even more of a creative writing contest.
The RVs are most often bullshit and irrelevant statistics with little or no value. Unfortunately, the one tool we have to clarify those numbers and put them in perspective (remarks) is being taken from us. You'd better hope that each board member has a solid grasp on statistical analysis or at least heard of the law of large numbers.