2 comments: (a) This is a government-owned entity making the investment, and (b) no U.S. banks own 100% of any banks in the PRC, nor does our government have an interest in any chinese banks. IOW, this investment is inherently unfair. But then, they're still buying US Treasuries - so we can't callout our masters on this hypocrisy.
I beg to disagree w/ you, fellas. It's the U.S. subsidiary of a Chinese bank. That means it has a banking charter issued by the U.S. government and the State of California. The U.S. subsidiary is a legally-chartered banking corporation in the United States of America. It is NOT a branch of the parent Chinese bank. I did spend 33 years in banking, and 20 of that in international banking (including running International Banking for a Texas bank), so I have been down a few of these roads.
Isn't it always, though?So... if I read this right... the sky is falling?
Everything Chinese is bad... except for those 6-packs of tube socks at WalMart for $3.99 - those are OK.Why does this matter at all anyways? Are their ATMs going to have too much lead content or something?