• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

electromagnetic pistol

PropAddict

Now with even more awesome!
pilot
Contributor
Neat curiosity, I guess. I kind of want to build one just for kicks, but I think I'll let the technology advance a bit.

He claims a muzzle velocity of 33 m/s, which is just over 100 fps. In other words, useless.
 

statesman

Shut up woman... get on my horse.
pilot
True... but this was also made in a garage using parts from Radio Shack. Imagine what 5 years of development and professional manufacturing could turn this into.

I see real promise.
 

BACONATOR

Well-Known Member
pilot
Contributor
Neat curiosity, I guess. I kind of want to build one just for kicks, but I think I'll let the technology advance a bit.

He claims a muzzle velocity of 33 m/s, which is just over 100 fps. In other words, useless.

Ya that seems like it's good to annoy people with and leave a welt. Now a Rail gun.... I'm game for that.
 

C420sailor

Former Rhino Bro
pilot
I always wanted to make a rail gun style artillery piece. It's not too difficult to do, and you could probably get some pretty awesome velocity and range off 220V house power.

Now what would I do with an electromagnetic artillery piece that relies on 220VAC? No idea.
 

eddie

Working Plan B
Contributor
Show me a gun made of carbon with caseless bullets of similar non-metal composites instead.
 

statesman

Shut up woman... get on my horse.
pilot
Why? so you can have more moving parts? This thing is entirely solid state. Caseless ammunition firing weapons have by and large been failures... often due to complexity.

What does caseless ammunition get you that a coil gun, that can produce muzzle velocities on par with chemical propellants, cant?
 

eddie

Working Plan B
Contributor
Why? so you can have more moving parts? This thing is entirely solid state. Caseless ammunition firing weapons have by and large been failures... often due to complexity.

What does caseless ammunition get you that a coil gun, that can produce muzzle velocities on par with chemical propellants, cant?

It gets you a gun that, in my mind, won't set off a metal detector. It was random, but I was wondering if it was even possible.
 

usmarinemike

Solidly part of the 42%.
pilot
Contributor
Why? so you can have more moving parts? This thing is entirely solid state. Caseless ammunition firing weapons have by and large been failures... often due to complexity.

What does caseless ammunition get you that a coil gun, that can produce muzzle velocities on par with chemical propellants, cant?

Maybe a weapon that won't run out of batteries in a gunfight?

Would a coilgun achieve a good spin on the projectile? I could do all kinds of right hand rule thumbpointing, but 6 months in Quantico and 6 months in Pensacola have rotted out both my EMag memory and my Give-a-Damn sense.
 

usmarinemike

Solidly part of the 42%.
pilot
Contributor
Pill_Hacker said:
Is this a dumbed down and mini version of the Rail Gun that the Navy was/is working on?

Rail gun =/= coil gun. I think with a rail gun there is contact between the projectile and the "rails" and electric current is passed directly through the projectile which make it an electromagnet. The coil gun doesn't include any contact with the energized parts of the mechanism. The projectile is already ferromagnetic. I could be way off, but so far that's my understanding.
 

JIMC5499

ex-Mech
The Electrical Engineer looking over my shoulder at the Gauss Gun website is laughing hysterically. Something about a rail gun project in college that would punch through 3/4" plywood with ease.
 

mmx1

Woof!
pilot
Contributor
Why? so you can have more moving parts? This thing is entirely solid state. Caseless ammunition firing weapons have by and large been failures... often due to complexity.

What does caseless ammunition get you that a coil gun, that can produce muzzle velocities on par with chemical propellants, cant?

The idea behind caseless ammunition is that it's smaller and lighter, and it removes the two steps of extraction and ejection and hence simplifying the operating cycle.

The G11's problem wasn't complexity, it was ammunition cooking off. As it turns out the ejected brass carries away a lot of thermal energy (as well as providing some measure of insulation from a hot chamber).
 
Top