I've had my fair share of them. Dropped all the soft panels, launched the water cooler, actually had a poopy suit make it to the TACCO station...never blew a tire.
I have seen main mounts blown on takeoff due to side loading caused by poor center line control causing an abort at max weight (139,760).
If I had to guess the cause of a blown nosewheel tire, it's going to be that, or the thing was already on its last cord and MX said "it's fine" (I know, they'd never do that.)
Landing flat was bad for the A-6 too.
Landing flat was bad for the A-6 too.
>1400fpm sink rate, if that NATOPS penguin hasn't jumped off the iceberg. I'm sure that assumed no deck movement, but can't recall. I do know my pilot once pulled off a little too much power in close to at the ramp and put one hell of a crick in my neck, but it wasn't an official hard landing.prob "bad" for it, but like the prowler, there is no MSP to tell you the damage (or really lack thereof in the case of a legacy Hornet) you did. I'm not sure what the criteria for a hard landing inspection is on an A-6/EA-6, but I am guessing it involves literally collapsing a gear in the LA
>1400fpm sink rate, if that NATOPS penguin hasn't jumped off the iceberg. I'm sure that assumed no deck movement, but can't recall. I do know my pilot once pulled off a little too much power in close to at the ramp and put one hell of a crick in my neck, but it wasn't an official hard landing.
My parents lived in married student housing at Sand Point while attending grad school at UW (1968-1970), which was formerly the base housing at NAS Seattle/Sand Point/NAVSTA PS.
My parents were probably hanging at the Blue Moon... with Tom Robbins.![]()
As in "still life with woodpecker" Tom Robbins?My parents were probably hanging at the Blue Moon... with Tom Robbins.![]()
As in "still life with woodpecker" Tom Robbins?