Think of a catapult as ....buzz ...buzz...buzz ... I miss shooting !!!
:icon_carn
Harruuumph. Air Department gibberish. Sounds like shooter-speak to me ...


Think of a catapult as ....buzz ...buzz...buzz ... I miss shooting !!!
:icon_carn
Ah yes, all is well until someone gets a "soft shot." A4's, you're not bashing the folks who got you off the deck safely all those times are you???Harruuumph. Air Department gibberish. Sounds like shooter-speak to me ...
![]()
Of course not ... but while you're at it ... how about fixin' the PLAT camera???Ah yes, all is well until someone gets a "soft shot." A4's, your not bashing the folks who got you off the deck safely all those times are you???
Out "fvcking" standingOf course not ... but while you're at it ... how about fixin' the PLAT camera???![]()
Think of a catapult as a double barrel shotgun (side by side). When the launch button is depressed, the launch valves (two of them, one for each cylinder in the cat), begin a 90 deg rotation (hydraulically actuated) which progressively allows steam pressure (450 or 520 psi) to fill the cylinders. Based on the weight of the A/C (called the capacity selector valve or CSV setting), the hydraulic pressure will either open the launch valves faster or slower. Heavy F-14's get the highest CSV setting (or they did during their last cruise on TR). So, steam pressure remains constant, but the rate at which steam enters the cylinders is controlled by the shooter. We base the CSV setting on the A/C gross weight, density altitude, and end-speed requirement (type A/C). You know, I miss shooting !!!
:icon_carn
Well, I took shots off the Connie, the HAWK, and the IKE ... no difference in "felt recoil" ......and the difference between the convential and nuke boats? The cats seemed shorter on the Connie and Kitty, at least compared to the nukes.
Well, I took shots off the Connie, the HAWK, and the IKE ... no difference in "felt recoil" ...
27Charlie's ... now that's a punch in the seat.
...and the difference between the convential and nuke boats? The cats seemed shorter on the Connie and Kitty, at least compared to the nukes.
"Loaded"??? An A6 ??? Off the LEX ???A loaded A6 off the Lex and Midway was sure a lot tougher than off the newer carriers.
slight course correction .....
One thing that still cracks me up is the reaction you get when you're sitting on the flight deck at night, brakes set, waiting your turn to come ahead ..... and somebody taxi's past you ....
WHAM !!!! The brakes go on big time as you jam them back on ... even though they're already set .... in an involuntary reaction to the sensation that you're rolling backwards ...
course correction ... out
Most of the "Go / No Go's" on the cats these days have nothing to do with cat track length or number of the cat. The limitations have to do with JBD panel limitations, what's behind the JBD, A/C wing spread limitations, and stores being carried. Our biggest and heaviest was ALWAYS a Tomcat full of gas and loaded for bear. If there was nothing behind JBD # 4, we could launch him on cat 4 all day. There are "other" limitations like time in AB, but none that had to do with the length of the cat.The cats were shorter; you old shooters can confirm this: weren't the waist cats even shorter than the bow cats? I recall a restriction on Forrestal that certain weights/load outs on the A6 could only go off the bow cats.
The cats were shorter; you old shooters can confirm this: weren't the waist cats even shorter than the bow cats? I recall a restriction on Forrestal that certain weights/load outs on the A6 could only go off the bow cats.
"Loaded"??? An A6 ??? Off the LEX ???
¿Qué pasa?
One thing that still cracks me up is the reaction you get when you're sitting on the flight deck at night, brakes set, waiting your turn to come ahead ..... and somebody taxi's past you ....
WHAM !!!! The brakes go on big time as you jam them back on ... even though they're already set .... in an involuntary reaction to the sensation that you're rolling backwards ...