EODDave said:
And since he said most, not all, that leaves some wiggle room for some of us "Lead from the front" type SNA's.
For some reason, the picture in my head is that of a gaggle of sperm trying to make it to its target.

Dave, you figure out how to fly that T-45 yet....seems like yov've been flying it since I was on the LINCOLN (over 2 years ago).
webmaster said:
No sense sending SWOs to SWOS (or however you spelled that swo-doggy school in Newport), since obviously they figured out that they didn't need to spend money training you guys (why waste the $$ in the fruitless task of teaching SWOs, that could be spent on my per diem or more Jet A?). What, you are the ONLY Line community that doesn't have a school or formal training before you it the Fleet, right? Hope you guys can tie your shoes, pull the knives out of your backs, and find the reply button on outlook to your DH's endless micromanagement emails.
Who loves ya?
Oh come on now, more dollars aren't gonna do you any good. That desk you fly everyday....well, that's just a figment of your imagination...it doesn't really fly at all; it's all make believe. And the Jet A you think it takes....well, that's just your spilled coffee. Now get back to work!
Guess I forgot to mention that most SWO's can't lead their way out of wet paper bag either, BOLC or no BOLC. I have the "7 Habits" and have read it, but can't for the life of me see why it needs to be required reading for BOLC. Bevo and Brett make a couple of good points. You simply can't learn this stuff out of a book. It fine to have theoretical foundation of sorts, but you have to get out there and get your hands dirty. One way is by taking a trip around to your spaces (or shop) and talking with the E's. SWO's don't normally get to know their people before taking a division. It's more of an ongoing process for us (or at least should be).
The navy's decision to get rid of baby SWOS (the SWOS Division Officer Course) in Newport is debatable. We were caught in a catch 22. Baby SWOS as it was, was too long for the material being taught. I can remember vividly the discussion among us students about how it should be shortened (or even as some suggested, just gotten rid of). Unless the navy was willing to pay per diem for all those students (i.e. it wouldn't be a PCS move), you couldn't shorten the course. Yet, it was still too long and needed to be reformatted. The navy's solution was to come up with an interactive CD program, Division Officer at Sea. Essentially it's supposed to mirror what was taught at baby SWOS with PQS and real life evolutions / OJT on a real ship. IMO one of the problems with the program as it stands now, is that every ship has implemented the plan differently. There was no direction for implementation standardization. So, there is still training being done for new SWO's, it's just being done differently. If I'm not mistaken (will have to do some checking), the tour lengths for first tour divos have not changed. So unfortunately, many commands feel they need to get their Ensigns in charge of a division (or some aspect thereof) as soon as possible. IMO, tours for these guys should be lengthened by 6 months, and they should be doing ONLY their Divo at Sea coursework for the first 6 months onboard, then take over a division.
How the hell did I get off on a tangent? Now where was I.....oh yea, berating aviators.