• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Blackhawk / CRJ-700 Midair

In my earlier comments with Red Blend, I was trying to illuminate the fact that maybe volunteering for collateral duties when you are unqualified in T/M/S and with so few flight hours, maybe trying to do everything in your control to study, sim, fly and get qualified should be your #1 priority. I was qualified in 4 T/M/S aircraft, 2 as an enlisted aircrewman, and 2 as an officer (NAO/NFO). There was NOTHING in my life that was more important than getting qualified - nothing. And yes, I understand that this is the ARMY's flight hour program fault, right @Flash ?

Yes, I realize there are LOTS of contributing factors in this mishap. If you have the opportunity, listen to the ICS comms between CPT Lobach and CWO2 Eaves just prior to the collision. The apathy is telling.

“Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”

- Captain A.G. Lamplugh

OK, let the flame spray begin
:)
 
Last edited:
In my earlier comments with Red Blend, I was trying to illuminate the fact that maybe volunteering for collateral duties when you are unqualified in T/M/S and with so few flight hours, maybe trying to do everything in your control to study, sim, fly and get qualified should be your #1 priority. I was qualified in 4 T/M/S aircraft, 2 as an enlisted aircrewman, and 2 as an officer (NAO/NFO). There was NOTHING in my life that was more important than getting qualified - nothing. And yes, I understand that this is the ARMY's flight hour program fault, right @Flash ?

Yes, I realize there are LOTS of contributing factors in this mishap. If you have the opportunity, listen to the ICS comms between CPT Lobach and CWO2 Eaves just prior to the collision. The apathy is telling.

“Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”

- Captain A.G. Lamplugh

OK, let the flame spray begin
:)

Unfortunately it seems the Army treats technical proficiency and tactical competency expectations for RLO pilots about the same as or worse than the Navy does for SWOs. It’s not uncommon for a RLO to have 500- <1000hrs at the end of a 20 year career.
 
Several conflicting comments concerning ADS-B, or if not conflicting, then not supporting ADS-B use.
This one in particular almost creates a case against mandatory ADS-B if in radar contact.
Pretty sloppy of the NTSB in my opinion.

"The lack of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) Out from the accident helicopter did not contribute to this accident, as the helicopter was still being tracked by radar"
 
Unfortunately it seems the Army treats technical proficiency and tactical competency expectations for RLO pilots about the same as the Navy does for SWOs. It’s not uncommon for a RLO to have 500- <1000hrs at the end of a 20 year career.
I’m over at Davison AAF quite a bit, the scuttle but about this aviator, and this mishap, is sad. I think the Army, and her command failed her completely.
 
Several conflicting comments concerning ADS-B, or if not conflicting, then not supporting ADS-B use.
This one in particular almost creates a case against mandatory ADS-B if in radar contact.
Pretty sloppy of the NTSB in my opinion.

"The lack of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) Out from the accident helicopter did not contribute to this accident, as the helicopter was still being tracked by radar"
Concur. A surprisingly bad take by the NTSB.
 
Several conflicting comments concerning ADS-B, or if not conflicting, then not supporting ADS-B use.
This one in particular almost creates a case against mandatory ADS-B if in radar contact.
Pretty sloppy of the NTSB in my opinion.

"The lack of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) Out from the accident helicopter did not contribute to this accident, as the helicopter was still being tracked by radar"

The accident CRJ-700 apparently did not have ADS-B in capability (CRJ700 is Out only), so I think I see how the NTSB got there. That being said, I still think ADS-B Out should be mandatory for ALL aircraft in that location, with ADS-B In strongly recommended.

I'd also argue that ADS-B in should be mandatory for airliners, but that's probably a non-starter.
 
Last edited:
Several conflicting comments concerning ADS-B, or if not conflicting, then not supporting ADS-B use.
This one in particular almost creates a case against mandatory ADS-B if in radar contact.
Pretty sloppy of the NTSB in my opinion.

"The lack of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) Out from the accident helicopter did not contribute to this accident, as the helicopter was still being tracked by radar"

Why do you say that? I'm asking because I'm not following, not because I disagree. I've only made it through a small portion of the report, so I no doubt am missing something.
 
Back
Top