Pilot who survived midair collision 37 years ago learns wreckage found
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/us/pilot-wreckage/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/us/pilot-wreckage/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
This is a great story, as the Admiral clearly says he caused the incident. Yet, he wasn't sh*t-canned and went on to have a distinguished Naval career as an officer and carrier aviator. I hope this is still possible in the New, Action Navy.
This is a great story, as the Admiral clearly says he caused the incident. Yet, he wasn't sh*t-canned and went on to have a distinguished Naval career as an officer and carrier aviator. I hope this is still possible in the New, Action Navy.
Crashes were far more common back in the day. And forgiven.
I think the Admiral might have acknowledged that, had his mishap occurred in today's climate of 'zero tolerance', his career would have been essentially over.
BzB
Does anyone know of an otherwise qualified senior officer who has been prevented from being promoted due solely to a mishap? I don't. AFAIK, that information wouldn't even be available to a selection board, nor would it be "admissible" for consideration unless it were part of a FITREP. So, barring loss of wings or designator following a mishap, I don't see how it would factor in at all. Of course, if the mishap were a symptom of an officer who gravitates toward buffoonery in general, then that aspect of the individual's overall performance would be reflected in a lackluster FITREP.
Or a JAG mishap investigation?I don't know if was from the mishap per se, but the results of a FNAEB would definitely impact your promotability.
Results of an SIR would not be available to the board but information that finds its way into a Pg-13 entry or a blurb on the FitRep would be seen by the board.
Does anyone know of an otherwise qualified senior officer who has been prevented from being promoted due solely to a mishap? I don't. AFAIK, that information wouldn't even be available to a selection board, nor would it be "admissible" for consideration unless it were part of a FITREP. So, barring loss of wings or designator following a mishap, I don't see how it would factor in at all. Of course, if the mishap were a symptom of an officer who gravitates toward buffoonery in general, then that aspect of the individual's overall performance would be reflected in a lackluster FITREP.
You're writing off the possibility of someone who was an otherwise fine officer making a single airmanship mistake and getting tanked on their FITREP as a result.
I'm not writing it off, but unless the CO thought the guy was AFU, it doesn't seem likely. A CO could also give someone a shitty FITREP because that person was the wrong race or religion - those are possibilities, but they're not possibilities that should keep anyone up at night.You're writing off the possibility of someone who was an otherwise fine officer making a single airmanship mistake and getting tanked on their FITREP as a result.
I'm not writing it off, but unless the CO thought the guy was AFU, it doesn't seem likely. A CO could also give someone a shitty FITREP because that person was the wrong race or religion - those are possibilities, but they're not possibilities that should keep anyone up at night.
Like we've been saying, assuming the mishap officer is an otherwise due course guy, the likelihood of a CO punishing him for a mishap seems remote - not impossible, just remote.