Yes, but the President has a say in the appointment of Supreme Court Justices and lesser judges. Of course, note how reticent both Democratic candidates have been regarding the recent deliberations in the Supreme Court. they know which side their bread's buttered on. Methinks Senator Obama would have a MUCH harder time with such unconstitutional BS on the national stage . . .
What unconstitutional BS?
That might not be much of an issue if the Supreme Court weighs in favorably with respect to the DC Gun Ban.Anyway, yeah, I am making a list of toys to buy before January 20, 2009.
Trying to tackle the 2nd Amendment is akin to tackling abortion. No politician is actively going to try it. It is too devisive and would be political suicide. Pundits on both sides of the fence shout all day long on their views merely to appease the lunatic fringe in their constituency.
That might not be much of an issue if the Supreme Court weighs in favorably with respect to the DC Gun Ban.
Trying to tackle the 2nd Amendment is akin to tackling abortion. No politician is actively going to try it. It is too devisive and would be political suicide. Pundits on both sides of the fence shout all day long on their views merely to appease the lunatic fringe in their constituency.
That might not be much of an issue if the Supreme Court weighs in favorably with respect to the DC Gun Ban.
Good luck getting rid of that amendment....I don't know how many states have to ratify it but you know the red states won't.
Close, but no cigar.....3/4 of the entire Congress, and then 3/4 of each and every state legislature. Very, very hard to get an amendment passed/repealed.