• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

01JUN26 SNA/SNFO board

Back for the september board I would copy and paste those old board sheets with the graphs and just change all the inputs to be the new data. Then someone would inevitably ruin the whole doc the next day. I’d delete and redo it and the cycle would repeat endlessly
 
Update:

OCM has evidently finally finished their review, we’re on the last step where NRC finalizes everything before posting results.

Unfortunately, “expect results late this week / early next week” (for the third week in a row)

I’ve served 9 years for the Navy and still haven’t wrapped my head around how slow it operates.
 
GalticJohn said:
Update:

OCM has evidently finally finished their review, we’re on the last step where NRC finalizes everything before posting results.

Unfortunately, “expect results late this week / early next week” (for the third week in a row)

I’ve served 9 years for the Navy and still haven’t wrapped my head around how slow it operates.
Click to expand...
You will wait, and you will like it. I remember in ROTC how bad the CNN rumor mill would get. (Cadet News Network)
 
GalticJohn said:
Update:

OCM has evidently finally finished their review, we’re on the last step where NRC finalizes everything before posting results.

Unfortunately, “expect results late this week / early next week” (for the third week in a row)

I’ve served 9 years for the Navy and still haven’t wrapped my head around how slow it operates.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the update - third week's the charm! 😝
 
GalticJohn said:
Update:

OCM has evidently finally finished their review, we’re on the last step where NRC finalizes everything before posting results.

Unfortunately, “expect results late this week / early next week” (for the third week in a row)

I’ve served 9 years for the Navy and still haven’t wrapped my head around how slow it operates.
Click to expand...
ISEL used to be pretty quick, the longer times are most likely reflecting the lack of available spots, that means there is probably no sense of urgency as the goal of ISEL was to get people who could go to OCS in I think it was 6 weeks?
 
exNavyOffRec said:
ISEL used to be pretty quick, the longer times are most likely reflecting the lack of available spots, that means there is probably no sense of urgency as the goal of ISEL was to get people who could go to OCS in I think it was 6 weeks?
Click to expand...
Do you think there’s a reason some applicants have heard back while others are still stuck in limbo? At the start of March, they were turning some packets around within two weeks, even though others who applied earlier had already been waiting months. Is it normal for them to hold pending packets and approve them in batches?
 
123412131 said:
Do you think there’s a reason some applicants have heard back while others are still stuck in limbo? At the start of March, they were turning some packets around within two weeks, even though others who applied earlier had already been waiting months. Is it normal for them to hold pending packets and approve them in batches?
Click to expand...
It could be as simple as the person looked at one group rather than the other, or it could be more complex only the person reviewing knows. It would make sense to review in batches if for nothing else than that is how the person approving as their calendar planned out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top