Search results

You think they'd pull back everyone's ISP with this? No way... I feel like someone would sue.

Doubt any of them are embraced by the mainstream, and you've seen a complete lack of tribalism from Dem leaders. - agree w/ @HokiePilot - this doesn't belong here, and probably warrants its own thread.

Or publish the data openly within the Navy with randomized identifiers (rather than DoD ID numbers or SSNs) and see what the community comes up with.

I can see the investigation taking a little while longer while the investigating officer gets his NMCI access revoked 15 times.

#FakeNews

I have a thought! Since the OP may not be on a limited-access portion of this site, where @robav8r's linked discussion is hosted, perhaps it didn't come up in the OP's search result and the OP isn't a turd. Just a thought. Not my final thought, I'll get another in just a minute. Also I can do...

There is an OHARP instruction. You should read it. When I did OHARP in 2008 OHARP was no-cost TAD. That means no cost to the government. Odds are that it's the same, but you really should google the instruction and get it. Google tips: 1. use "site:navy.mil" to limit your results to only Navy...

No no no, one thousand times no. Lying is not ok in our business. @Hammer10k: that was bad gouge. If an applicant fails to mention an issue, he takes the decision of whether or not that issue is an acceptable risk out of the hands of professionals trained to make those decisions. That is not ok...

I don't wish you ill, but if you can't figure out your next step based on what we've all been saying here, maybe applying isn't the best use of your time.

Gee, if only there were a reference for this... Instructions: look at your record, look at this. Compare. Discuss with recruiter. Since no one here is looking at your record (please don't post it) and odds are your reviewer is not on this board, you have a >0% chance as far as any of us are...

Holy smokes. Google is very easy. it's catching on, I promise. In case it's a challenge: "Hair coloring, wigs, or hair pieces must be of a natural hair color, such as blond, brunette, brown, red, gray, or black, not be distracting from a professional appearance in uniform and complement the...

When you are disenrolled from NROTC, your CO has an opportunity to recommend or disrecommend you for future officer programs, and that's on one of the forms. If the same is done for USNA, that will be telling for your chances going forward.

Are you in NROTC? Can't you ask your service assignment officer these things? I used to be one, but the rules are always subject to change.

If you get selected for 1160N or 1170, you can decline and go 1160. There is no other place to go from your selected designator than to 1160. If you get 1390 and your CO really really wants you to get a nuke interview, you don't have to.

Did you actually go to your interview and have the Admiral say "congrats, you're a nuke"? If yes: you're a nuke, service assignment doesn't apply to you. If no: not a nuke, but that can be fixed. Poseidon will get his due. If you have an interview before your SA is decided and pass, SA won't...

Well, that'll save me some money while I try to get the only VA-approved flight school in my town to actually live up to their agreement. Time to do some digging... Thanks @ChuckM.

Hm. Well, I'll give that a shot tomorrow. A little more hopeful for it, as I followed up w/ my Part 141 school here and they've decided to not take VA students for the time being because they were not reimbursed (from over a year ago, apparently) for the last two VA students they took. Sounds...

I'm sure he's getting doxxed all over the place elsewhere, but I was kind of hoping we could be better and more mature. Should we be enabling random actors with the tools to render those consequences from all over the world? Won't he have a CO very soon to take care of that? Doesn't he have one now?

I could see where this might go... maybe we ought to leave him alone.

We did, but in 2009 that did not include instrument-airplane. I think the thinking was that our Navy instrument rating was issued for a helicopter, not an airplane, despite our primary training being nearly sufficient to accomplish it. Also, I think ATP is a little farther out for me. I don't...

Well, didn't mean to throw insults, so I'm sorry I caused offense. My sarcasm mux/demux was disabled at the time - meant everything I said at face value. Happy to engage that discussion when others are ready.

Yeah, so just like pro sports drafts, it would even things out. Otherwise you have year after year of low-GPA students going to the rust buckets. Think that makes anything better?

Yeah, my selected school seems to think it's still alive, too. I'll recount my experience in this thread since there doesn't seem to be anything else current here. My situation: Separated non-current helo pilot (last tour was non-flying). I have Commercial Pilot, ASEL, Rotorcraft Helicopter...

I understand that plenty. We can have a civil discussion without personal insults, can't we? Maybe you can attack my argument and not me. I will do my best to do the same. Then we can all be proud of how mature we are and set good examples for the yung'uns here. Or, we can just retreat to our...

That would be an actual bearing problem, for sure... one could not be a spoiled brat about things, just as we're not supposed to be w/ service assignment, SNA pipeline assignment, or squadron assignment.

Did he counter-protest your protest of that lack of transparency here?

This brings to mind my feelings on the matter of ship selection - it should be like a draft. Ships choose based on reverse Battle E points. MIDN can somehow publish what their desires are. The wardroom researches candidates based on what they think is accessible, and the COs get on the radio...

Not anymore, poor fella... I doubt many of us would want our dining-ins, foc'sle follies, or other internal shenanigans on the internet.

We just continue to have unanswered questions. People have had those. We're not taking up arms or even lawsuits over it. Just asking questions. Nothing's been wrong w/ that no matter who's "guy or gal" has won or lost, for as long as there have been presidents. Just asking questions...

Being comfortable in one's skin is worth something. So put me in for a *yawn*, too.

Has anyone seen anything official from the VA saying this is done for? All I can tell is the death of this program is simply hearsay. Via VA site: http://www.benefits.va.gov/gibill/flight_training.asp It's still available... is there anything more authoritative and thorough than this site...

ok can we be done here, kids?

You'd also have to not separate them in the middle of that tour because VT(P) wasn't "production" enough for Millington.

Holy smokes. Please take a deep breath and look at what you're writing. It makes my eyes hurt. If you're asking someone for help at least make it easy on them.

Third option: 101 gets some of the CAT 1s, who are not the initial ones. Ok so is it A, B, C?

It's possible he's about to leave. He does have a helmet bag in his hand. Not sure why he's walking around w/ cammies and a helmet, but that's "normal" silliness.

The darts seem to be flying freely. :cool: sunglasses for safety.

Doesn't come up anywhere in MANMED Ch 15 or in NAMI waiver guide. I assume the OP did his/her searching before asking us to make him/her feel better.

Looks to be PMC for that upper right laser beam thing.

May only be accessible from a .mil domain.

Ask (or even call) NAMI about the AERO database. It's where all flight physicals are recorded and routed. Waivers and supporting documents are all scanned in there, too. There's supposed to be a general-availability CAC access "coming soon," so anyone can access info about themselves, but even...

3. "Most" of our air wing would comprise >3 aircraft.

You can actually take the DLPT w/in a few months of being commissioned, and the bonus pays, if applicable, will show up in your first paycheck.

Anyone w/ access to AERO should be able to get it for you. They'll just need your DODID. Actually, a self-serve version was supposed to be coming "soon," but yeah.

Also, it might not look too good if you're <6mos from a deployment and you bust a knee, etc...

OK. Good point. Thanks.

With a CAC, the MyNATEC website. Without, Jublov's your best bet. I no longer have a CAC, but I think it was mynatec.navair.navy.mil

I see what you did there. You talkin' 'bout me? Have I said what I think about guns?

Fine, disassembly?

2 mastiffs and a tarantula? That's unique.