• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Should I stay or should I go? Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying And Love HSC.

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I just saw the new Growler ACTC instruction and syllabus. Guess what - there's even more A/A events than ever before. A lot more. I figured you'd enjoy that fact. We also got CNAF to sign off on ensuring that Growlers get first dibs on all airspace in C7F... and red air too. Enjoy your command tour! :D
 

pilot_man

Ex-Rhino driver
pilot
I just saw the new Growler ACTC instruction and syllabus. Guess what - there's even more A/A events than ever before. A lot more. I figured you'd enjoy that fact. We also got CNAF to sign off on ensuring that Growlers get first dibs on all airspace in C7F... and red air too. Enjoy your command tour! :D
I know your enjoying Fallon and all but Meth is bad, mkay.
 

DanMa1156

Is it baseball season yet?
pilot
Contributor
Touche! JB is always available at Costco for $20 / 1.75 L bottle. I drink mine with soda. So I'll leave the finer stuff to the @HAL Pilot 's of the world!

Try some of the Costco (Kirkland) brand liquors. I turned my nose up to them until my neighbor from Mexico and tequila connoisseur swore by Kirkland tequila and so far, everything I've tried was better than its price point in my opinion. #gladtofinallymakeanonHSCpost
 

wlawr005

Well-Known Member
pilot
Contributor
With that, I'll jump in. @Brett327, you stating the problems, solutions, and missions executed by my community has about as much credibility as when you stated that you teach pilots how to fly and trap on the boat. I'm happy to have a legitimate discussion with individuals such as @Python1287 who genuinely owns that he doesn't know that much about HSC and would like to learn. To this point, you are the only one that I have seen from other communities, specifically VFA and VAQ that sells as having a clue about what we do. The typical HSC JO, whether CVW or expeditionary will spend the overwhelming majority of his time doing PMC and SAR/MEDEVAC. This is especially true of CVW squadrons. And yet, they are a valuable asset for FAC/FIAC if the mission arises, as well as other ASUW areas and overwater SOF/PR. But even when shown multiple examples of instances where we have executed missions outside of that, you call it the "laughably aspirational state of HSC" and those missions aren't visible to the naked eye. @lowflier03, DT, and the boys did great things in Irbil. I don't give two shits what you think about the video on youtube.

On two deployments, I executed ASUW, NTISR, and operational overwater SOF support. From a training standpoint, I have supported CAG (not the Navy Air Wing Commander), MARSOC, DEVGRU and others. I understand that I won't be their first call and maybe not at all. But its a blast to support their training and the flights are a great time. That being said, I agree with you that I mostly flew trash and ass. And I'm ok with that. I love the mission. I have voiced that we should minimize the overland training, especially DA and CAS. We train to it so heavily in my opinion due to the multitude of overland ranges, and lack of overwater ranges that can meet the mission expectations. The overwater piece is trained to as much as we can support not for the fact that we are doing it now, but having a base line knowledge of how to do it when the SHTF. I don't claim to be the TF. Or the RQS community. If I wanted to fly black helicopters, I would have taken the IST I was offered. One of my former FRS students just did.

I agree with @fc2spyguy that we don't get nearly the NCEA that would make us proficient. But I will appreciate knowing my way around the weapons systems if I ever need them. KD can speak to what -85 is doing in the PI, which from what I understand is incredible. Thankfully guys with that experience now sit in HSC front offices.

Remind me again, how many air-to-air kills does the VAQ community have in the last 20 years. I'll wait, and yet you spend page upon page arguing with a VFA TO about the need to train to the mission. Last I checked, VFA has one. I am happy to stand corrected if my knowledge is off base. I find is great the attention that HSC gets on this site, but we aren't even close to the only community that trains to missions we haven't done much of operationally. It appears that your definition of mission execution is rounds leaving the aircraft. So therefore I ask, how many subs has HSM and VP sunk? How many mines has HM neutralized? Going back to Korea, Navy helicopters have primarily been PMC/SAR. Yet, numerous conflicts have led these squadrons to fly missions well outside of what they were expected to perform.

Finally, I agree that people in my community walk around in the two piece bullshit, IR velcro patches, and camo helmet covers like they work for JSOC. I'm not one of them. I am realistic when it comes to what big Navy expects of me, especially CAG. Next time I deploy, I will happily VERTREP your ordnance and fly your broken/sick to the beach. At this point, I have .7 hours in the D thank god! But the aperture of our capabilities and exposure of them is getting better. Just had a visit with 2nd Fleet and without being asked, raved about HSC and HSM. What I hope, based on your obvious success is that when you are CAG, or another major command position you put your misconceptions aside. You continuously state "based on your experience," which is likely around CVW HSC squadrons turning circles around the boat. HSC CVW squadrons bring much more to the table, and there is another half to the community that does great things.
Well thought out post. Before you get spun up, just know that air wing dudes that deal with Growler dudes most of the time also feel this way. @Brett327 just has a way of epitomizing everything most of us hate about them, and he also epitomizes what most of us hate about senior leadership too.

With that said, watching an EWO dismiss an entire community is hilarious. Please continue.
 

fc2spyguy

loving my warm and comfy 214 blanket
pilot
Contributor
It’s not the message you don’t like, just the messenger.
I may be wrong. The EWO community today seems like delivering an overnight amazon package in an 18 wheeler. It's like miniaturization got lost on the whole community and mission.
 

RedFive

Well-Known Member
pilot
None
Contributor
I still don't really get what FIRESCOUT brings to the fight.
#UnpopularOpinion: There are sensitive things I don't think should be discussed here and I need to get around to drafting a high-side white paper about the issues, but having been an operator and intimately familiar with the technical challenges, my opinion is that Fire Scout is a system of systems balancing on top of a beach ball and HSC leadership is incredibly foolish to have latched onto it (though I admit I don't know if they had a choice, but somehow HSM escaped).

The amount of money that has been spent on it, including the shipboard systems, should have been spent on a small bolt-on radar for Sierra and maybe even the ever elusive moving map. What MQ-8 buys the ship in terms of SA is not, in my opinion, worth the incredible lengths we've gone to in order to see it succeed. I would also point out that the metric of success is an incredibly low bar compared with other aircraft and missions. LCS would be better off with two 60s or, gasp, a mixed Sierra/Romeo DET.

Stupid is having an underslung sensor.
No. No it's not. It's just a CHEAP implementation. The Romeo pilots I work with were just complaining the other day about the patterns they have to fly to maintain MTS coverage, whereas that's much less of an issue for us. In fact, it was really helpful to be able to look under the bird at targets on my deployments. For a fraction of the cost of a FLIR ball, a couple of crafty engineers could have designed a REAL "stow" mechanism that flips that bitch up and out of the way when desired instead of the existing mechanism which simply spins it around and misuses the word "stow."
 

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I may be wrong. The EWO community today seems like delivering an overnight amazon package in an 18 wheeler. It's like miniaturization got lost on the whole community and mission.
I think that fate awaits both designators sooner than any of us would prefer.
 

insanebikerboy

Internet killed the television star
pilot
None
Contributor
HSC overland is a stop-gap until the Army or Air Force can show up.

Expeditionary and CVW HSC is not manned, trained, nor equipped to perform more than a few days in the overland environment. Those few days of overland work are almost entirely supported from the boat. For any HSC folks here that disagree, go ask your suppo how to get an extra PUK from the wing. He'll probably laugh you out of his office.

HSC as a whole isn't set up to provide squadrons/dets overland due to the requirements that the CSG/ESG/LCS all have.

HSC-8 in Irbil was a one off and they were able to successfully support the guys there.

HSC-85 is an entirely different animal in how and where they operate that it's not really accurate to say they are traditional HSC. Hopefully the Fleet will benefit from 85 having the 60S as 85 is really good at getting airframe improvements much quicker and that will trickle out to the rest of the squadrons.

After having done this operationally for 12 straight years now, my opinion on traditional HSC is they need to go back to the old-school HS "brown-boot club". Identify a few crews, maybe 2-3, that are fully qualified for overland missions, and train the rest of the crews only in the overwater mission. Sure, some dudes will be butt-hurt but this saves flight hours, NCEA, banging up airframes, etc, and meets that stop-gap requirement the Admiral needs.

During that "stop-gap", if shit gets really bad, the Pros From Dover (the 160th) will show up out of the blue. If shit gets really, really bad, the dudes that don't even exist will show up. I've "seent it" firsthand.

The reality is that Navy is operating in a phase 0/phase 1 environment. Even if WW3 breaks out, the Navy only needs to provide rotary-wing in the littoral for a brief period, if at all. The majority of the rest of the time is dedicated to IZ defense. What does the Navy need for that? GAU-17, rockets, and a huge NCEA to get really good at it. The rest is a waste of time and resources.
 
Top