• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Heavy Metal (of the rotary kind)

Boomhower said:
We had a -53 come out to the Lincoln when I was in the Gulf. The thing turned on the flight deck for what seemed like a couple of hours. That damn thing pretty much shook the whole damned ship. It was incredible how much power is coming off of those rotors.

One of the pilots was a brunette girl that was SMOKING hot. I'm not talking about "I've-been-on-this-boat-for-seven-months-and-the-last-two-ports-I've-been-to-were-both-Bahrain-and-that-was-three-months-ago" hot, but really hot. She was eating in the downstairs wardroom and I think the whole airwing was just sitting in the wardroom for no particular reason.
Click to expand...

Can't always guarantee there will be hot pilots that come with the airframe.
 
zipmartin said:
They might be gone now, but HM-16 provided the helos for the rescue attempt of American hostages in Iran on 24 April 1980. Picture from the USS Nimitz 1979-1980 cruisebook.
hm16.jpg
Click to expand...


D models. You gotta read the book about the planning/events for this SAR effort. Lots of things done right, just a couple more things done wrong. I was surprised to learn that the pentagon started planning that rescue the day after those folks were taken hostage. Took 'em a year to work it up. Too bad it turned into a clusterfuck.

If you are wondering why I am not providing the title of the book it is because I can't remember it at this moment. I am sure someone else will come along and provide it. If not, I'll do so when I get home.
 
HeloBubba said:
D models. You gotta read the book about the planning/events for this SAR effort. Lots of things done right, just a couple more things done wrong. I was surprised to learn that the pentagon started planning that rescue the day after those folks were taken hostage. Took 'em a year to work it up. Too bad it turned into a clusterfuck.

If you are wondering why I am not providing the title of the book it is because I can't remember it at this moment. I am sure someone else will come along and provide it. If not, I'll do so when I get home.
Click to expand...

Is this the book you're thinking about?

c80092c008a017d2766c8010.L._SL500_AA240_.jpg


PS - I wouldn't characterize this Hostage Rescue as a "SAR" effort. As to things gone wrong, it did serve as a defining moment in transformation of how US organizes, mans, trains, equips, plans and executes Joint Special Operations so the lives lost and overall disappointment had far reaching and significant benefical effects that are with us even today.
 
zipmartin said:
They might be gone now, but HM-16 provided the helos for the rescue attempt of American hostages in Iran on 24 April 1980. Picture from the USS Nimitz 1979-1980 cruisebook.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, what did HM-16 do when they didn't get any of their helos back? They gave up 8, which I assume was a decent fraction of whatever they had assigned. Did they just cross-level from across the whole fleet, buy new ones, or just sit around their ready room and make helicopter noises? I've done a lot of reading about EAGLE CLAW, but can't recall ever hearing this aspect addressed.
 
FlyinSpy said:
Out of curiosity, what did HM-16 do when they didn't get any of their helos back? They gave up 8, which I assume was a decent fraction of whatever they had assigned. Did they just cross-level from across the whole fleet, buy new ones, or just sit around their ready room and make helicopter noises? I've done a lot of reading about EAGLE CLAW, but can't recall ever hearing this aspect addressed.
Click to expand...

Don't know what they did. I know enough ancient 53 guys, so I'll find out. HM-16 didn't decomm until 1987, so they stretched it out somehow.

Iran did take a few of those 53s left behind. Here's a pic.....

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran...1545240/&sid=a906e2c4291c97c540a12113a9711f71
 
Not going to lie. Had the duty stations for the 53 been better, and the future of the airframe not so vague/unknown, I'd have actually wanted to select it. It's a BEAST and looks like fun to fly.
 
When I went through, selecting 53's could be tough. Even if you did want it didn't mean you'd get a slot, and the slots that did come up were pretty competitive.
 
insanebikerboy said:
When I went through, selecting 53's could be tough. Even if you did want it didn't mean you'd get a slot, and the slots that did come up were pretty competitive.
Click to expand...

There were 2 53 slots my week and also a few in the weeks prior. The guys who got those slots had 53s a higher choice than I had the slot I got.
 
OttoWrote8 said:
There were 2 53 slots my week and also a few in the weeks prior. The guys who got those slots had 53s a higher choice than I had the slot I got.
Click to expand...

Just goes to show the essence of timing. I think there was 1 slot over the span of two months around my winging time.
 
getthumbnail.aspx


getthumbnail.aspx


getthumbnail.aspx



getthumbnail.aspx


HELMAND PROVINCE, Afghanistan-Marines with Combat Logistics Battalion 8 attach an M777A2 Lightweight Howitzer to a CH-53E Super Stallion at the helicopter landing zone here. The Marines transported three howitzers over 75 miles to support 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment's operations in neighboring Nimruz province., Sgt. Christopher R. Rye, 9/28/2009 2:22 AM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top