• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

01JUN26 SNA/SNFO board

dannycookss said:
That includes duplicate applicants & a couple admin errors. I’d estimate ablht 10% less for each designator but the real number isn’t possible to get
Click to expand...
I wish it was categorized by I-SEL, BDCP, et al. could give at least some clarity to an applicants standing. These guys are dragging their feet.
 
Last edited:
szalona said:
Is this the “at board” list? I checked the list and searched for my name and I couldn’t find it, but I already got selected so I’m unsure if the excel sheet list includes ISEL.

Idk tho
Click to expand...
yes it’s the at board list & ISEL is not included because you guys are special
 
How deeply does the selection board bias against reporting past (years ago) Marijuana use? I disclosed it to MEPs and had to on this package because of that. All the advice I ever received from recruiting forums was to disclose this information (I have buddies that are SNA and SNFO that absolutely used, whether or not they were honest idk). I have to pass random drug tests with my flight program with the FAA if they wanted to.
 
Dbpilot said:
How deeply does the selection board bias against reporting past (years ago) Marijuana use? I disclosed it to MEPs and had to on this package because of that. All the advice I ever received from recruiting forums was to disclose this information (I have buddies that are SNA and SNFO that absolutely used, whether or not they were honest idk).
Click to expand...
It’s definitely something they take into account especially for clearances. I just had a buddy lose his enlisted intelligence rate he signed for due to “excessive marijuana use” because he would smoke a couple of times a week/month for a year

It’s all dependent on how long ago it was & the frequency you smoked though (I believe)
 
dannycookss said:
It’s definitely something they take into account especially for clearances. I just had a buddy lose his enlisted intelligence rate he signed for due to “excessive marijuana use” because he would smoke a couple of times a week/month for a year

It’s all dependent on how long ago it was & the frequency you smoked though (I believe)
Click to expand...
That gives me some hope you said that. My recruiting office thought it’s possible I didn’t get picked up for that in September (I don’t think a 6,6,7 was good enough to begin with). I have an application comment regarding that use but it’s been years back in the early college baseball days. I just wasn’t sure if they look farther than the application itself. I had someone else reply saying they don’t read the motivational statement or LOR so I wasn’t sure if they took the application comments into consideration. I appreciate the insight, thank you.
 
szalona said:
Is this the “at board” list? I checked the list and searched for my name and I couldn’t find it, but I already got selected so I’m unsure if the excel sheet list includes ISEL.

Idk tho
Click to expand...
Yes! This is based on the spreadsheet share point NRC released in their GENOFF -or whatever it is- results tabs
 
Kendo1 said:
Yes! This is based on the spreadsheet share point NRC released in their GENOFF -or whatever it is- results tabs
Click to expand...
The screenshot I saw of that, when my recruiter notified me I was at board, had numbers next to the names. (Ex. 151, 198, 182, 251). Do you or anyone else with access to the sheet know what these mean?
 
Dbpilot said:
That gives me some hope you said that. My recruiting office thought it’s possible I didn’t get picked up for that in September (I don’t think a 6,6,7 was good enough to begin with). I have an application comment regarding that use but it’s been years back in the early college baseball days. I just wasn’t sure if they look farther than the application itself. I had someone else reply saying they don’t read the motivational statement or LOR so I wasn’t sure if they took the application comments into consideration. I appreciate the insight, thank you.
Click to expand...
I’m certain they read the LORS and motivational statement for competitive scoring applicants; they wouldn’t ask for them just to disregard it. At the very least I would assume they are glancing at who the LOR is from and skimming through your motivational statement to see if it’s substantive towards Big Navy’s mission and not just wanting to fly because it looks cool.

6/6/7 is a competitive score. Don’t overthink it, you got this
 
Kendo1 said:
I’m certain they read the LORS and motivational statement for competitive scoring applicants; they wouldn’t ask for them just to disregard it. At the very least I would assume they are glancing at who the LOR is from and skimming through your motivational statement to see if it’s substantive towards Big Navy’s mission and not just wanting to fly because it looks cool.

6/6/7 is a competitive score. Don’t overthink it, you got this
Click to expand...
It's a general use form and other designators do read LORs and motivational statements. Aviation doesn't care; they're after applicants who have the desired quantitative scores (ASTB, GPA) that historically demonstrate you won't flunk out of training. Each applicant is looked at for like 60 seconds.
 
123412131 said:
It's a general use form and other designators do read LORs and motivational statements. Aviation doesn't care; they're after applicants who have the desired quantitative scores (ASTB, GPA) that historically demonstrate you won't flunk out of training. Each applicant is looked at for like 60 seconds.
Click to expand...
Damn. I had higher hopes for the boards judgement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top