Let’s do what
I would have as well. But I’ll bet you boned something minor up back then.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
NEWS US involvement in Iran
- Thread starter Max Q
- Start date
Really x2?
Haha, no doubt. I do recall losing accountability of a desktop monitor as the RO working in the S-4. It was devastating... 😄
At least I was qualified to be in that job and had the requisite qualifications to be the RO...unlike Leavitt.
That's a lot to hope for, and probably not a viable plan given the amount of material supposedly involved.
While Mossad had some pretty impressive successes Iran was still able to strike back at Israel up until the very end of the conflict.
I don’t disagree entirely, but I imagine the information is either known, or will be discovered soon. How the parties react is, of course, up in the air.
X2…are you retired yet?
I don’t think there are any qualifications for being a WH spokesperson.
Besides a cartoonish level of backing up and doubling down on whatever your boss says.
Think of it like the bullys smaller friend who just says the same thing the bully did, but in a sneering voice.
Sure, that pretty much fits the bill of all of them going back for years.
To some degree the mouthpiece of the president has always had to be that way.
Although a mouthpiece cant make much noise on its own, it just amplifies whatever is blown into it.
I couldn't place the exact instance of what I was thinking of, but thats probably one of the influences to my analogy.
Leavitt is married to a man 32 years her senior. DNI Tulsi Gabbard released a campaign-style video a couple weeks ago saying how close to nuclear war we are. Then Trump said "I don't care what she said" about Gabbard's having said before that the intelligence community has concluded Iran is not currently pursuing a nuclear weapon. Then it came out she was being kept out of discussions regarding striking Iran. Then she tweeted recently that her testimony has been taken out of context.
Not to mention had a baby with him conceived before they were engaged. Look, I’m a shitty Catholic, but I love someone showing up on TV wearing a giant cross necklace immediately after all that.
vxc961
.
I’m just trying to understand your position. The NYT leans left, but has a high factuality rating in general. Do you think they’re so far left that they’d deliberately lie just to rain on 47’s parade? If they were misled, do you think the “low level scum” who leaked it is the one trying to rain on his parade?
I’m not trolling—but it seems to me the preliminary BDA implied a lot of the equipment was deep enough that it can be dug out and dusted off in a few months. Separately, it seems the 60% enriched uranium likely was moved before the strike.
Karoline Leavitt’s statement seems to indicate the initial assessment assessment exists as reported to me, but I could be wrong.
Are we seeing the same set of facts?