Spekkio
He bowls overhand.
Ok, lemme break this down for your barney style...
hal posts a link of documents that have no offensive language, but have a banner stating that there is offensive language.
taxi1 posts some diatribe about racism in 1942...
I ask wtf that has to do with hal's complaint?
sonog chimes in with 'it isn't hard, this banner is associated with the entire catalogue.' At this point in the conversation, this implies that sonog believes that taxi1's link is part of the catalogue and the reason the banner exists on the declaration of independence and US Constitution pages.
I point out that the banner does not in fact exist on taxi1's link, thus refuting sonog's point.
You interject with some true but ultimately irrelevant facts about web page structure.
hal posts a link of documents that have no offensive language, but have a banner stating that there is offensive language.
taxi1 posts some diatribe about racism in 1942...
I ask wtf that has to do with hal's complaint?
sonog chimes in with 'it isn't hard, this banner is associated with the entire catalogue.' At this point in the conversation, this implies that sonog believes that taxi1's link is part of the catalogue and the reason the banner exists on the declaration of independence and US Constitution pages.
I point out that the banner does not in fact exist on taxi1's link, thus refuting sonog's point.
You interject with some true but ultimately irrelevant facts about web page structure.