Good thing the US Navy has nothing to do with this....
...or else they would commission a task force...er, a "Joint Task Force," with an 0-7 in charge, to recover the aircraft. A staff would be stood up (based in Hawaii, of course), and would immediately commence their required annual training (IA, Trafficking Persons, SAPR, CIMEO, PRT, PFA, DADT, safety stand downs, etc.). Following the annual training (ensuring Green Boxes on their 'readiness' matrices), they would then turn to designing PPT slides as they come up with creative ways to justify their proposed budget. After the budget is approved...and the money hits the bank...they would then commission environmental impact surveys. This, of course, would require close coordination (read: concurrent, stove-pipe planning) with State, who would then set up their own task force to slowly, smoothly garner Burmese support for the required visas/permits to make this happen. Of course, they'd require their own environmental impact surveys, which, while completed by the same EPA (or its subcontractors), would conflict with the Navy's results, miring approval decisions in the courts (US courts or Burmese courts??) Several years later, after giving Burma a gift of tens of millions of dollars of "aid," the Navy will finally be allowed to allow its well-compensated contractors to retrieve one aircraft, which would be boxed up, loaded onto a 3rd Fleet LPD (which just got back from a year-long ARG deployment and had to turn right around, of course), sailed through the Panama Canal, and finally delivered to Pensacola...
...where it would be taken and placed on the ramp at NPA to await a slow death.
