Tell that to CAG-7 . . .IE...this can't be a bluff. We can't ask guys who just came off deployment, surged, and then returned from surge to short notice turn to the crisis du jour.
Tell that to CAG-7 . . .IE...this can't be a bluff. We can't ask guys who just came off deployment, surged, and then returned from surge to short notice turn to the crisis du jour.
If senior leadership (both POTUS, Congress and all the folks with "The Honorable" as titles) wants to play these games fine, but they need to realize that if there is another Katrina, tsunami, earthquake or uprising in a foreign country, all we can do is watch it happen on CNN/FOX/MSNBC, etc and say, 'remember when we could have done something to help'?
CAG-7. We deploy so you don't have to!Tell that to CAG-7 . . .
A 20% pay cut.DoD civil servants are also looking at being furloughed once a week from April until 30 Sept for a total of 22 days meaning they will lose a month of pay out of 5.
OK. This I see as a big problem and an unintended consequence of legislation that intended for this to be resolved the first time through. SO, it can be fixed by legislation. Maybe even a simple resolution. Just prorate it. They would still get their 10 year cut. Where is the problem?And that's why some people are saying that if the cuts go through, it would have been better for us to have been hit with them at the "cliff", so the effects aren't just now compressed into half a year.
Which is why the country will go broke. Most of our expenses are entitlements that are virtually untouchable.And it's more than just some line items being sacred cows, even if we decided some stuff really wasn't absolutely vital, we (even the top levels of DOD) don't have budgetary authority to turn, say procurement or R&D cuts into OMN money to keep the lights on, planes flying, and ships at sea. Which is why CJCS is asking for reprogramming authority to be able to do just that.
So to go back to your household 10% budget analogy, it's more like if you got hit with a 10% pay cut, but now you could only adjust the food budget to realize those savings because even though there are other things you would probably want to touch first (utility usage, luxuries) can't be adjusted this year.
OK. This I see as a big problem and an unintended consequence of legislation that intended for this to be resolved the first time through. SO, it can be fixed by legislation. Maybe even a simple resolution. Just prorate it. They would still get their 10 year cut. Where is the problem?
Which is why the country will go broke. Most of our expenses are entitlements that are virtually untouchable.