When experienced pilots sit on the side line and jobs go unfilled is that a shortage of pilots or a shortage of reasonable pay and benefits to lure qualified pilots?
True enough. Aircrew experience, investment in optional on board safety equipment, depth of systems operation control, optional in house weather service, turbulence tracking and management systems, training in excess of FAA minimums, innovative safety programs, etc, are not depicted on Expedia, Orbitz, Priceline or any on line reservation site. But the majority of passengers will jump on the airline with a $2.00 savings in fare not knowing what that $2.00 is buying them at another airline. In my view, it is worth every penny.Sadly, Americans who will jump to another airline to save $2 will eventually get what they pay for.
True enough. Aircrew experience, investment in optional on board safety equipment, depth of systems operation control, optional in house weather service, turbulence tracking and management systems, training in excess of FAA minimums, innovative safety programs, etc, are not depicted on Expedia, Orbitz, Priceline or any on line reservation site. But the majority of passengers will jump on the airline with a $2.00 savings in fare not knowing what that $2.00 is buying them at another airline. In my view, it is worth every penny.
I believe the regional airlines are less safe than the major airlines. For the most part, their pilots do not have the experience of the major airline pilots and they will not attract/keep experienced pilots with their crappy pay and work rules.Maybe I'm just as dumb or naive as most pax, but are you saying that cheaper airlines actually are less safe? Not doubting you at all, but I'd be interested in hearing why for future reference?
You get nothing for free. If they charge less then they have reduced costs somewhere. Sometimes that is in all those optional features, and more, I noted above. Sometimes it is in the salaries for employees. Does that make them unsafe? People make mistakes whether they work for a low cost carrier or a legacy carrier. At some airlines mistakes are avoided or a mistake is absorbed by the features I listed above. At other airlines a mistake can become an unbroken link in a chain leading to mishap because they have not invested in the costly extras. You can't just look at accidents or fatalities. Most large legacy airlines fly in very high threat environments like South America, Africa and Asia. The ATC is often poor to unsafe. Mountains, poor charting, language barriers, poor weather services, crew fatigue, and more make that kind a flying more challenging then flying up and down the west coast for five legs and laying over in Portland. Not really fair to compare apples to oranges.Maybe I'm just as dumb or naive as most pax, but are you saying that cheaper airlines actually are less safe? Not doubting you at all, but I'd be interested in hearing why for future reference?
Absolutely ... anyone who thinks otherwise is in serious denial.I believe the regional airlines are less safe than the major airlines. For the most part, their pilots do not have the experience of the major airline pilots and they will not attract/keep experienced pilots with their crappy pay and work rules.