• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Law of War/Law of Armed Conflict Discussion

statesman

Shut up woman... get on my horse.
pilot
Was checking out this video and was surprised at the small caliber gun protecting the tail :eek: is the weight factor of a .50 cal that critical they can't use one.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=20d_1205419520

Could be mission specific. As I understand you are not allowed to shoot AT a person with a .50 cal machine gun, or there are limitations, just as there are limitations regarding what ammo you can shoot. If they are not expected to engage vehicles, might be something the JAG required.

Additionally, a .308 is not such a 'small caliber'. I certainly wouldn't want to be on the business end of that.
 

SH-60OB

Member
pilot
Could be mission specific. As I understand you are not allowed to shoot AT a person with a .50 cal machine gun, or there are limitations, just as there are limitations regarding what ammo you can shoot. If they are not expected to engage vehicles, might be something the JAG required.

^^ Myth

U.S. NAVY NWP 1-14M (Formerly NWP 9 (Rev. A))
U.S. MARINE CORPS MCWP5-2.1
U.S. COAST GUARD COMDTPUB P5800.7

other wise known as: THE COMMANDER’S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF NAVAL OPERATIONS


9.1.1 Unnecessary Suffering.
Antipersonnel weapons are designed to kill or disable enemy combatants and are lawful notwithstanding the death, pain, and suffering they inflict. Weapons that are designed to cause unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury are, however, prohibited because the degree of pain or injury, or the certainty of death they produce is needlessly or clearly disproportionate to the military advantage to be gained by their use. Poisoned projectiles and small arms ammunition intended to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering fall into this category. Similarly, using materials that are difficult to detect or ndetectable by field x-ray equipment, such as glass or clear plastic, as the injuring mechanism in military ammunition is prohibited, since they unnecessarily inhibit the treatment of wounds. Use of such materials as incidental components in ammunition, e.g., as wadding or packing, is not prohibited. Use of .50 caliber weapons against individual enemy combatants does not constitute a violation of this proscription against unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury.



For a more erudite and thorough explanation please see





 

Ace_Austin

Member
pilot
As I understand you are not allowed to shoot AT a person with a .50 cal machine gun, or there are limitations...

If your not shooting AT someone, or through a cinder block wall, 2 interior walls and a wardrobe AT someone... whats the bloody point of bringing the .50 to work? As for these limitations... I would think they would be something like this "LCpl Smith, I know as much fun as it is, try to fight the urge to unload the entire belt on the as*holes. 5 rounds is plenty to vaporize them."
 

hscs

Registered User
pilot
Could be mission specific. As I understand you are not allowed to shoot AT a person with a .50 cal machine gun, or there are limitations, just as there are limitations regarding what ammo you can shoot. If they are not expected to engage vehicles, might be something the JAG required.

Additionally, a .308 is not such a 'small caliber'. I certainly wouldn't want to be on the business end of that.

Statesman -- until you have actually been briefed about ROE from a JAG and had a weapon on a plane that you might have to use, I suggest you keep comments like this to yourself. They are just plain wrong.
 

statesman

Shut up woman... get on my horse.
pilot
It appears I was wrong. I had gotten my information from an active duty Marine here at my unit who has been to Iraq. Granted not a JAG, but I gave the gouge credibility. My mistake.
 

p1brule

Frenchy
pilot
Have you ever heard of a MAP or a CATT teams? What do you think they're using? Ma deuces and mark 19's baby. Bring what works.

And having talked to some of the pilots out at P River, they're trying all sorts of things to see what works best as a defense weapon in the Osprey. They're thought is that the superior speed of the Osprey will make it a less likely target than say a 53. So it may not require as much defensive firepower. Btw, 53s have .50s too.
 

Mitch

disease free
It's CAAT. Combined Anti-Armor Team. Combined Javelin and Heavy Machine Gun sections from weapons company. MAP = Mobile Assault Platoon. Composition varies from one battalion to the next but typically includes Marines from the three major players in a weapons company (81s, Javelins/TOW, and HMG). 3-4 MAPs per Bn. Obviously very mobile w/ a lot of firepower. Mortars are typically left in the rear.
 

Mitch

disease free
[quote Mortars are typically left in the rear.[/quote]

allow myself to quote myself...the tubes, not the Marines
 

Cavrone

J-Hooah
pilot
Statesman -- until you have actually been briefed about ROE from a JAG and had a weapon on a plane that you might have to use, I suggest you keep comments like this to yourself. They are just plain wrong.


Probably outdated, but I was taught the same thing at MCT. No engagement of personnel with a .50 cal.
 

FLYTPAY

Pro-Rec Fighter Pilot
pilot
None
Probably outdated, but I was taught the same thing at MCT. No engagement of personnel with a .50 cal.
Can we get rid of this myth forever?!:icon_rage If you have a 1.00 cal, it is perfectly legal to shoot the enemy with. You can shoot them with 20mm, 30mm, and in fact you can drop 2000# bombs on them.
 

raptor10

Philosoraptor
Contributor
Can we get rid of this myth forever?!:icon_rage If you have a 1.00 cal, it is perfectly legal to shoot the enemy with. You can shoot them with 20mm, 30mm, and in fact you can drop 2000# bombs on them.
No way! 2000# bombs! Won't that, like, kill them‽ :D
 
Top