Dos Gringos

[Kinner]

Regs

Well stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly regulations anyway. It isn't like NAVAIR doesn't have some idiotic regs, but we aren't proud of them, promote them to other services as enlightened, or accept them without our fair share of push back. THAT, I am proud of. You ought to try it some time.

Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.

 

[Mumbles]

Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.

Please Sir,

losen this up a little bit.

This thread reminded me of a Youthley Puresome article.

http://www.tailhook.org/Fa02YTH.htm

 

[zab1001]

All of a sudden, this thread feels like the Skipper just walked in on you doing something fun, yet stupid.

 

[HAL Pilot]

What does anyone's understanding of the term JUDY have to do with "regulations?"

Perhaps because it's in the regs? Just a thought.

I bet you are just a whole bunch of fun to fly with.......

 

[Brett327]

What does anyone's understanding of the term JUDY have to do with "regulations?"

Perhaps because it's in the regs? Just a thought.

I wouldn't call the ALSA manual "regs." More of a reference publication, really.

Brett

 

[Catmando]

What is the problem?

My RIOs over the years in different aircraft used to call "Judy" routinely – nightly, on every training intercept with Ruthless Ruth in W-291 and also in the more hostile real world. I had the honor of flying with some of the very the best who knew what they were doing. Calling "Judy" was routine.

Have things so changed?

 

[wink]

Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.

You missed the point of my post. My apologies. It meant to imply it was the AF that had the "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" regs (apart from the Judy discussion here) and it was typical of many AF officers to promote them to other services as enlightened, or accept them without push back. It is the Navy that tends to push back against said idiotic regs. And by that I do mean, in part, getting things changed. Not that good ol bitching isn't helpful on several levels.

 

[Single Seat]

what does anyone's understanding of the term judy have to do with "regulations?"

perhaps because it's in the regs? Just a thought.

judy.

anyone with the ability, we also send mickey's as a digital "bitchslap" to each other.

 

[Brett327]

judy.

anyone with the ability, we also send mickey's as a digital "bitchslap" to each other.

That's funny. I'm going to try that.

Brett

 

[Nafod]

This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?

 

[Single Seat]

That's funny. I'm going to try that.

Brett

Sometimes it takes three or four for them to get it. You have to be quick so it goes out as they're talking.

You're in a Prowler though, you should be able to to WAY funnier shit.

 

[wink]

This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?

Basicly, bashing the AF is more fun then listening to Dos Gringos.

 

[nittany03]

This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?

You seem to be lost. Are you trying to find this place?

 

[Single Seat]

You seem to be lost. Are you trying to find this place?

Shack.