Yeah, that worked out real...well.I would not be surprised if contract maintenance was in the Deepwater proposal because the program was being run by.........contractors.
Yeah, that worked out real...well.I would not be surprised if contract maintenance was in the Deepwater proposal because the program was being run by.........contractors.
I would not be surprised if contract maintenance was in the Deepwater proposal because the program was being run by.........contractors.
Yeah, that worked out real...well.
New info....CG will not be getting S-3 Vikings. The CNO however with the stroke of a pen is in deep consideration of retaining the S-3 for 5-6 more years to gap what is lost with the P-3 fleet being half down. Two squadrons will stay around. This info is from the pit at the Weapons School.The last I have heard from my very reliable contacts is that the Coast Guard is considering S-3s as a interim survelliance package but it simply that, a consideration.
Coastieflyer how long have you been in the branch? I left the 65 branch in '06.
Keith Trepanier
New info....CG will not be getting S-3 Vikings. The CNO however with the stroke of a pen is in deep consideration of retaining the S-3 for 5-6 more years to gap what is lost with the P-3 fleet being half down. Two squadrons will stay around. This info is from the pit at the Weapons School.
Heard this has actually taken place. Should be interesting to see how this plays out with no RAG and the need for JO's.
Wonder if the Misty's of VS-41 will be brought back with the need for JOs until the P-8 comes on board??
The S-3 is not going to stay around, apparently the effort is getting quashed. The plan was never to restart the RAG/VS-41. They were going to keep transition decliners around to man the squadron (VS-22).....sort of like the Dirty Dozen flying S-3's.Wonder if the Misty's of VS-41 will be brought back with the need for JOs until the P-8 comes on board??
...sort of like the Dirty Dozen flying S-3's.