• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

CMV-22B Osprey Rollout

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I'm sure this was taken seriously....

1920px-US-3A_DN-SC-87-06468.JPEG

Miss Piggy! One former Foo Dog in my squadron called that bird an IG investigation just waiting to happen.
 

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor
CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.
From my limited perspective this all makes sense.
 

sevenhelmet

Low calorie attack from the Heartland
pilot
CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.

Agreed. I was mainly looking at this as a case study of how the acquisitions process has been broken over the past several decades.
 

ea6bflyr

Working Class Bum
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Agreed. I was mainly looking at this as a case study of how the acquisitions process has been broken over the past several decades.
Yes, buy what you can afford, not what you need. A-6=>[A-12]=>F/A-18 is a great example as well as the COD=>VOD show.
 

Uncle Fester

Robot Pimp
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.

Yes, buy what you can afford, not what you need. A-6=>[A-12]=>F/A-18 is a great example as well as the COD=>VOD show.
Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.
 

exNavyOffRec

Well-Known Member
Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.
If they stuck with the C-2 the you could have people saying I fly the C-2 like my father and grandfather lol.
 

ea6bflyr

Working Class Bum
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.
So much like the F/A-18 decision. How many years has the B-52 flown?
 

Mos

Well-Known Member
None
I think it's more like 68 years for the B-52 at this point. The P-3 had a pretty respectable run of about 60 years (plus, still flying with some countries).
 

IKE

Nerd Whirler
pilot
I think it's more like 68 years for the B-52 at this point. The P-3 had a pretty respectable run of about 60 years (plus, still flying with some countries).
Wikipedia says 69 for the fortress.

Now for some helo love:
  • The H-1 is 65, which I think makes it the longest serving choppah.
  • I saw a green & white H-3 flying yesterday for 63 years of service.
  • The H-60 is only 45, but my money is on it going to 70+.
Those are all fielding/introduction numbers. The YUH-60A first flight was 5 years before the Army fielded it.
 

Llarry

Well-Known Member
Wikipedia says 69 for the fortress.

Now for some helo love:
  • The H-1 is 65, which I think makes it the longest serving choppah.
  • I saw a green & white H-3 flying yesterday for 63 years of service.
  • The H-60 is only 45, but my money is on it going to 70+.
Those are all fielding/introduction numbers. The YUH-60A first flight was 5 years before the Army fielded it.
Some of these numbers are the equivalent of fighting Vietnam with World War I SPADs!
 

Dontcallmegump

Well-Known Member
pilot
I think it's more like 68 years for the B-52 at this point. The P-3 had a pretty respectable run of about 60 years (plus, still flying with some countries).

And it flew fine for me today.... after a 5 hour preflight.

Our "young" birds are pushing 40. The majority are older than my parents.

Put us in the bag of cans being kicked down the road. At least we aren't far from the bin.
 

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor
I picked 61 years for the B-52 off the production age of the H model, the only model flying (or being upgraded) today. The AF is now in the process of adding new engines and radar systems to the B-52 so it might even make 90 or…gasp…100!
 
  • Like
Reactions: IKE
Top