Ask half a dozen 'smart' folks about hypersonics today and you'll likely get at least 4 or more answers. As with many things, it gets complicated when you start digging. Some weapons that are claimed to be hypersonic are in fact capable of hypersonic speeds but they don't fit into the widely accepted or popular contemporary definition of a 'hypersonic' weapon. Fun fact, hypersonic weapons have been around for ~70 years and they're more popularly known as ballistic missiles (not all ballistic missile reach hypersonic speeds but most do or are capable of doing so).
What is talked about today in the context of hypersonic weapons covers a relatively wide range of systems that encompasses short to long-ranged weapons, launched from a variety of platforms against a variety of targets with conventional and nuclear warheads. Hypersonic weapons pretty much all need some sort of booster to achieve hypersonic speeds, and the easiest way to do this is strap them to the top of a ballistic missile but not all get up to speed that way. Of course, then you get in to what exactly is a 'ballistic' missile nowadays since many don't fly a classic 'ballistic' flight path...
Anyways, manned hypersonic platforms that aren't likely in the cards in the near future. The cost just ain't worth it, and what would the point be? An unmanned system to do the same job would not only cost less and be able to do it just as well but would also be much lower risk.