...Later, at his stop, Robinson and the driver continued to argue, joined by the latter's bus dispatcher, Beverly Younger, who casually referred to Robinson in his presence as "a nigger." When military policemen arrived at the scene, a crowd of indignant whites, both civilian and military, had formed, adding to turmoil and confusion. The MPs on site, none of whom outranked the lieutenant, asked him to go with them to the police headquarters to straighten out the situation. He agreed to do so. However, when they arrived at the station to meet with the camp's assistant provost marshal, a white MP ran up to the vehicle and excitedly inquired if they had "the nigger lieutenant" with them.We are treated like wild animals . . . like we are inhuman. . . . The word Negro is never used here, all they call us are nigger do this, nigger that. Even the officers here are calling us nigger.
—Anonymous black soldiers, Jackson (Mississippi) Air Base, 1942
What in the blue hell does that have to do with tagging the declaration of independence and US Constitution as having offensive language? Is the n-word used anywhere in either document?
Of course you see nothing wrong with it. You're one of the woke.Maybe they need to add a trigger warning to those so easily offended by a tiny disclaimer that they need to vent about it on the internets?
Also: NARA replied by clarifying that the warning was not meant to demarcate any particular document in the catalog and that it was a blanket warning for all records kept by the office.
This shouldn't have to be explained to college educated people, but the banner is a standard element of the NA catalog, which functions as a viewer of NA database content and links to other NA site pages outside of the catalog. You're seeing the banner in Hal's screen grabs of the founding documents above because it's just the catalog viewing those documents. You're not seeing the banner in the Jim Crow article, because that page is outside of the catalog.When I clicked the link provided by @taxi1, I had no banner that the post might contain harmful or offensive language. So clearly this is specific to paritcular pages.
This shouldn't have to be asked to college educated people, but did you bother to read the post I actually responded to?You're not seeing the banner in the Jim Crow article, because that page is outside of the catalog.
Which post? You posted three times in response to members in this thread (not counting your response to mine), and quoted only Sonog.This shouldn't have to be asked to college educated people, but did you bother to read the post I actually responded to?