..other than having them thumb their nose at us when our President demands a "strong response" for things like a rogue nation launching missiles in defiance of existing resolutions??
Well, we great great documents like this one:
http://www.undp.org/cpr/documents/sa_control/SALWGuide_Legislation.pdf
"Ammunition controls are an integral part of comprehensive control measures and play an important role in reducing the misuse of small arms. A valid firearms license should be shown every time ammunition is purchased, and the dealer should keep a record of the quantity and the purchaser. A maximum limit can be placed on the amount of ammunition that can be purchased in a month, as well as a limit to the amount of ammunition that can be stored. These limits could be different for each category of firearm license. It should be clear that ammunition for proscribed SALW use should also be prohibited for civilian purchase."
"Good reason should be required for every small arm possessed under a license (see principle 2 above). Someone may have a good reason to possess a single firearm, but the law should not assume that this same reason automatically justifies a second one, or a third. Each time good reasons should be proven, taking into account the firearms already possessed. In addition, there should be an upper limit for the number of firearms possessed."
Make no mistake, YOUR tax dollars went to pay the salaries of the people who wrote this bullshit. You paid for the computers they wrote it on, the IT system that stores that crappy data, and you are paying to maintain their servers, and the paper that it is printed on. The UN started with good intentions but it is a total abject failure, and serves only as an forum for rogue nations to throw turds at the United States. Any future dollars spent on this useless debate club is a total waste.
Well, we great great documents like this one:
http://www.undp.org/cpr/documents/sa_control/SALWGuide_Legislation.pdf
"Ammunition controls are an integral part of comprehensive control measures and play an important role in reducing the misuse of small arms. A valid firearms license should be shown every time ammunition is purchased, and the dealer should keep a record of the quantity and the purchaser. A maximum limit can be placed on the amount of ammunition that can be purchased in a month, as well as a limit to the amount of ammunition that can be stored. These limits could be different for each category of firearm license. It should be clear that ammunition for proscribed SALW use should also be prohibited for civilian purchase."
"Good reason should be required for every small arm possessed under a license (see principle 2 above). Someone may have a good reason to possess a single firearm, but the law should not assume that this same reason automatically justifies a second one, or a third. Each time good reasons should be proven, taking into account the firearms already possessed. In addition, there should be an upper limit for the number of firearms possessed."
Make no mistake, YOUR tax dollars went to pay the salaries of the people who wrote this bullshit. You paid for the computers they wrote it on, the IT system that stores that crappy data, and you are paying to maintain their servers, and the paper that it is printed on. The UN started with good intentions but it is a total abject failure, and serves only as an forum for rogue nations to throw turds at the United States. Any future dollars spent on this useless debate club is a total waste.
