Did someone call for the Growler rep?This is why the real money is in C-UAS.
My idea: det cord net guns for the MH-60S. Shoot the net, roll away, trigger remote detonator.This is why the real money is in C-UAS.
My idea: det cord net guns for the MH-60S. Shoot the net, roll away, trigger remote detonator.
No, seriously. Makes WAY more sense for you all to do it. I argued this on deployment. Our sensors actually make us a poor choice, and who's always within xx miles of the HVU?And then it will only be a matter of time before the MH-60R takes over this mission.![]()
No, seriously. Makes WAY more sense for you all to do it. I argued this on deployment. Our sensors actually make us a poor choice, and who's always within xx miles of the HVU?
I sent a -60S up against an inbound LSF this year. It was pretty eye-opening. Definitely something we should all train to better. We need helo AICs![]()
That disappoints me. I did plenty of LSF intercepts in the 60S and never seemed to have a problem; really enjoyed them, escorting a Panda or similar out of the carrier's airspace.
Back in my 60F days, I was launched twice on alert for LSFs. For those who don't know, 60F did not have radar, FLIR, or Link, so yeah... we needed a good AIC.This thing popped up (late detection), so it happened relatively quickly. IIRC, they took a vector from their controller on the CVN (who didn't have good SA on the LSF track). The helo bustered out there right past the LSF, they CPA'd at ~1nm with a few thousand feet altitude difference and didn't see it (they though it was farther out). Not any fault of the aircrew, without sensors on board they were completely reliant on the controller; I've heard C5F deployers train to this a lot more (for good reason), but we were caught pretty flat footed and learned from it.