Friend, you can’t imagine two more entirely different worlds. Infantry is dirty, hard, direct and highly kinetic. As an infantry officer you will work with a wild mix of some of the best and worse people America has to offer - and often they will sometimes be the same person. I mean some serious grotesque dumbasses and some remarkably smart people.
As a naval aviator you’ll be a highly skilled technical expert. Yes, you will command sailors (and probably find a mix of idiots and patriots, just at a different percentage) but the “leadership” aspects are very different (this is not to disparage naval aviators, their skills are necessarily focused elsewhere).
In the infantry you’ll spend most of your time maintaining infantry focused gear.
In naval aviation you’ll spend most of your time maintaining aircraft and aviation associated gear.
Infantry training is not really focused heavily on weapons use per se but maneuver so the weapons can be used. Put broadly, enlisted guys shoot, officers get them there. On my last combat tour (about 330 days in country total) I went on at least one foot patrol a day, often more (my diary count is 625 patrols ranging from as little as an hour to two days) but only fired my rifle a handful of times.
I can’t comment on the combat naval aviation side since I haven’t so much as spit out of a tactical aircraft cockpit - but I can tell you when we needed air support they laid iron on target at a wonderfully accurate rate (and our TAC was a stud).
If you want to try to combine both, become an army W.O. pilot and work hard to get into the 160th SOAR. Even conventional army pilots sleep in the field, shoot for the record twice a year (I don’t think the navy does that) and have an opportunity to smell the dirt. In the end, however, you are talking about two very, very different worlds, so choose carefully.
