-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
OIC question IRT NJP issues
- Thread starter Flying Low
- Start date
Obviously it changes EVERYTHING!!!!!!111!
IIRC, can't you charge drunk and disorderly under Article 134 without a specific BAC? As long has you can prove that they had enough to "impair the full exercise" of their faculties, or whatever the verbiage is?
Pretty sure OPREP guidelines/regs/whatever request or require a BAC for all ARIs, we always got them with a BAC or 'BAC pending' and posted the summary with them. I haven't looked at the 'Daily Darwin Awards' in a little while but I doubt the Navy dropped that requirement.
How drunk didn't really matter. Charges for public intoxication will still stand.
Homeguard CO/XO fully support OIC's decision. Would be a different story if there was an assault, car accident, etc.
No one likes this OIC anyways. He is accused of trying to protect his guys and keep things at his level.
Homeguard CO/XO fully support OIC's decision. Would be a different story if there was an assault, car accident, etc.
No one likes this OIC anyways. He is accused of trying to protect his guys and keep things at his level.
Obviously a failure in leadership.
But...but...BAC is required! It wouldn't be if it wasn't critically important dammit!
Oh, the horror.
