Spekkio, you didn't get a mock interview practice session thing on your VIP trip?
Sort of, but I wasn't the one answering the questions.
Or do you mean a one-on-one actual simulation of what you'll get in DC?
Yup.
Because all I got before the interviews was an hour in the classroom with the NTOs and other applicants out in Seattle,
The LT offered a 1 on 1 mock interview, so I'm going to utilize it. Couldn't hurt.
Not that practice would have helped any; nobody knows what crazy problem the interviewer has up his sleeve. No amount of studying would have saved me from that first guy.
What'd he ask you?
Not all recruiters are scum bags. Again, they're all great Marines in the fleet. They need the recruiting gig to punch their ticket to continue with their career, and it's very easy to be unsuccessful in the recruiting world. The recruiting world has a nasty habit of destroying your career if you're unsuccessful, and most of these guys are trying to avoid that.
I don't think that all recruiters are scumbags, and I'm sure that they do a fine job when on duty. When the Navy does stuff like lose my prints, I just chalk it up to the fact that the Navy's primary job isn't to process paperwork, but to keep our seas safe -- and they do a damn fine job at that.
I'm not a recruiter, so I have no idea the type of pressure these guys are under to make quota. I can certainly understand that they don't want to kill their careers, but I still don't think it's right that the end result is a new recruit getting duped by recruiters who promise them the world. Looking four years down the line, who's more likely to re-enlist: the recruit who had accurate information about what he was getting into when he signed on the dotted line, or the recruit who's pissed off because his recruiter promised him things that were flat-out false, ie: "you should enlist; it'll increase your chances of becoming an officer"?
Ideally, potential recruits and officer candidates should be able to find out all the necessary and accurate information they need from their recruiters. While this is not the case, fortunately we live in an age where some initiative and independent research can allow you to obtain the information you need. Perhaps the military needs to change the way it pressures recruiters if so many are inclined to resort to such tactics to meet quota.
As for the recruiter that says he lives, breathes, eats, and sleeps Marine Corps and would choose it over his wife - he may not be lying. There are Marines that feel that strongly about the Marine Corps. I can tell you that the Marine Corps saved me from a life of worthlessness.
I probably came across a little too ambiguous here. In that case, the applicant didn't think that the recruiter was lying. However, he was turned off by the Sergeant's zeal for the Corps -- he said that the recruiter was literally yelling about how great the Corps is. He also said that the recruiter gave him virtually no time to ask any questions.