The basis for age 60 was based on health. With the advances in medicine, it would be extremely difficult to make the argument to decrease the retirement age.
Age 65 was bound to happen. But the FAA should have been allowed to control the process, do the medical studies to verify no detriment to safety, and to plan a phase-in that would alleviate the many issues and problems associated with the change. A controlled phase-in would not have pissed off pilots as bad as this abrupt change.
There are a lot of politics and background that you have no clue about. If you did, you would not be asking about a change to 55.
Age 65 was bound to happen. But the FAA should have been allowed to control the process, do the medical studies to verify no detriment to safety, and to plan a phase-in that would alleviate the many issues and problems associated with the change. A controlled phase-in would not have pissed off pilots as bad as this abrupt change.
There are a lot of politics and background that you have no clue about. If you did, you would not be asking about a change to 55.